ARG
0
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2011
- Messages
- 6,772
- Points
- 113
So what is the deal with the M vs H? Has anyone proven them to be different or a better bin on the same diode?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Are we sure every diode is tested? I feel like it wouldn't be required for such an efficient process.
Hmmm, so it's possible then, that the H1600 could be a more efficient bin of the same diode? It would match up with the numbers.
The H diode I have is doing 2.168W at 1.8A with a G1 lens.
So I'd say the H series is a crap shoot as much as the M series are.
The H diode I have is doing 2.168W at 1.8A with a G1 lens.
So I'd say the H series is a crap shoot as much as the M series are.
I remember reading about how huge efficiency gains were reported by using a very difficult to achieve crystal of GaN as substrate. Something to do with how it is hard to get it to crystallize homogeneously along that plane, and how substrates for C-plane GaN are ridiculously small and expensive.