- Joined
- Oct 24, 2009
- Messages
- 1,179
- Points
- 63
Good point Byrnz92.
Bad Scotty 577, it's Byrnz93 ---lol
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Good point Byrnz92.
People keep saying "and for the price, you can't beat it". The starter one, the cheapest, barely has ANY features at all
Ipods are really great compared to any other mp3 players, if you like music you do want an Ipod, believe me. I've got an Ipod Nano 4G and I've never regret the 120€ it costed to me
Ipods are really great compared to any other mp3 players, if you like music you do want an Ipod, believe me. I've got an Ipod Nano 4G and I've never regret the 120€ it costed to me
Sound quality is the single biggest mistake people make when they prioritize features. In almost all topics regarding choosing a new player, people say they want "good sound quality" or even "the best sound quality". In a lot of cases that's the feature that should have the lowest priority. The sound quality that makes it to your ears is only as good as the headphones that actually spits out the sound and while the sound quality of the player does matter, it shouldn't be the deciding factor if your headphones is a $40 pair of Koss PortaPro or something else cheap. You don't need rocket fuel to run a lawnmower.
Upgrading from even the most crappy sounding player to a good sounding one will only improve the sound quality a little compared to investing in some good headphones. If you plan on using the cheapest consumer level headphones anyways, then over focusing on sound quality will mean that you down prioritize things like user experience and other features that in the end might be what you find most important. My advice is that if you're making a thread asking for help on a new player, write "sound quality that fits XXX headphones" instead of always going for the "best sound quality".