Oh come on people, you're blowing this out of proportion. What's wrong with taking your Kenometer, sticking it in another box, and "renaming" with some label? I mean, hell, I could take a Laserbee meter (which I have), stick it in a box, call it a "Badgermeter," post pics of my "modification," and really, what is he going to do about it? Sue me for posting some pictures of my DIY mod? That I stuck a sticker on a box containing "his" meter? There's nothing "illegal" about it. Just because Laserbee produces his own line of meters doesn't imply that he's ripping Kenom off, rebagging Kenometers, or engaging in oneupmanship to be a dick.
Let's return to reality here. Think about this: what makes the Kenometer/Laserbee/any meter valuable as a meter? Calibration against a known source. Everything else is just gravy to make it easier to use that calibration for measuring the output of lasers. What makes a Kenometer a "Kenometer"? The firmware. The remainder of the Kenometer is just support hardware that virtually anyone can piece together. It's why I just bought a Kenometer Lite for the sensor and parts: I can make my own firmware if I want it.
The firmware is the only unique component of the Kenometer; it's what gives the Kenometer its ease of use and its overall look and feel. Kenom should definitely be outraged if Laserbee were rebagging his firmware in other hardware. It'd be like Apple suing Psystar for using OSX on alternative hardware: it's the software that they were suing for, not the commodity components. Likewise, it's not the Arduino + power supply + buttons + LCD that gives the Kenometer value; even the sensor is commodity hardware. Nor is the design particularly special. Anyone can do that. Rather it's the labor and manufactured product that is far more valuable than the design. This is why Sparkfun/Adafruit/etc.'s claims on the success of "open source hardware" are generally without merit, as these designs derive their value from the completed products, not the designs themselves. Most of these "open source" designs--just like the Kenometer/Laserbee/etc.--are just support hardware surrounding specialized parts (like the Arudino and sensor).
Laserbee's mods address just the support hardware, including the power system, noise protection, and other systems that reside outside the Arduino. He also swapped out the buttons for other ones and mounted the meter in a different case. Untouched is the firmware and the overall design of the meter itself. Laserbee is also not rebagging the firmware (the valuable part!) in other hardware and trying to profit from it.
I appreciate the review of the Kenometer Pro, and its pros and cons. My complaint about Laserbee's post is that he hasn't provided any details on what he modified to supposedly make it better. In effect, it just makes some statements about what he has "improved" but the claims can't be verified. If these modifications are indeed good, I hope he shares these design changes with Kenom (should he decide to make many more), and the public so that the Kenometer Pro performs even better.