HIMNL9
0
- Joined
- May 26, 2009
- Messages
- 5,318
- Points
- 0
Re: 445nm A130 Lens Comparisons!
Do you mean exchange the main (first) lens with the 405 one ? ..... if so, i'm sorry to say you that this probably don't work (and can end in the destruction of the negative lens of the triplet, too)
Those lenses in the triplets are built with specific curvatures, and focal lenghts ..... changing one of them, or also just the distance between them, just make the things worse ..... they are matched for correct the lateral deformation in the lens assemblies, mainly for photographic use, and is for this reason that the dot appear more "round", also if in fact it's still oval ..... maybe draws explain better what i mean:
There is no "magic" inside the lens that can correct the fast axis, is just that the lenses are matched for "correct" in different degrees he light that pass from the center and from the external, so it become a bit more "linearized", as you can see in the first example (sorry, very schematics and a bit emphasized, just for give the idea) ..... where instead, using a single lens, the two divergent axis becomes collimated almost as they are, giving the spot more "oval" .....
Also be careful, if you want to disassemble one of them, to mark the sense of the lenses ..... the first positive element have an internal curvature that is or identical, or in some cases a very little less than the face of the negative one that go placed on it, where the external curvature is a bit more accentuated ..... once, i cracked the negative one just cause i placed the positive reversed in the tube, and it pushed at the center of the negative one, instead that on the border as in the normal mounting sense (the negative one is very thin in the center)
Thats the other thing that I was planning on experimenting with...
Taking apart an AixiZ 405 lens, and trying to take out the main optic and replace it with the 405-G-1 to see if it will clean up the 405-G-1...
But like you said... probably dreaming!
Do you mean exchange the main (first) lens with the 405 one ? ..... if so, i'm sorry to say you that this probably don't work (and can end in the destruction of the negative lens of the triplet, too)
Those lenses in the triplets are built with specific curvatures, and focal lenghts ..... changing one of them, or also just the distance between them, just make the things worse ..... they are matched for correct the lateral deformation in the lens assemblies, mainly for photographic use, and is for this reason that the dot appear more "round", also if in fact it's still oval ..... maybe draws explain better what i mean:
There is no "magic" inside the lens that can correct the fast axis, is just that the lenses are matched for "correct" in different degrees he light that pass from the center and from the external, so it become a bit more "linearized", as you can see in the first example (sorry, very schematics and a bit emphasized, just for give the idea) ..... where instead, using a single lens, the two divergent axis becomes collimated almost as they are, giving the spot more "oval" .....
Also be careful, if you want to disassemble one of them, to mark the sense of the lenses ..... the first positive element have an internal curvature that is or identical, or in some cases a very little less than the face of the negative one that go placed on it, where the external curvature is a bit more accentuated ..... once, i cracked the negative one just cause i placed the positive reversed in the tube, and it pushed at the center of the negative one, instead that on the border as in the normal mounting sense (the negative one is very thin in the center)