Re: Need advice for a new computer please
SSDs have a great data access time - where it takes hardly anytime for reach a specified memory address, but HDDs still have a much faster data streaming rate. So if you need to frequently store, transfer, or view very large files (On the order of hundreds of mb) HDDs are still very relevant.
That depends actually, and is often untrue. A high-end Velociraptor hard drive, for example, will only be able to
beat a middle-of-the-road SSD in sequential writes, and not all that significantly either. For everything else, including
reading sequential data, the HDD is beaten--in many cases by orders of magnitude.
Anandtech also chose the Intel 320 because it is middle-of-the-road in terms of SSDs. Other SSDs perform better and SSDs increase in performance the larger they are because they can access more chips in parallel. It's like having more drives in a RAID 0 array.
Also there are few cases where you'll really be pushing data at the full sequential throughput. Most of the times this involves simply transferring files from one point to another, which is infrequent. This
does fit into the good use of HDDs these days: large bulk storage. However, for everything else, the SSDs are generally more effective in all respects.
When I got the SSD, I was able to do stuff I never thought was possible... like running Flash, Dreamweaver, Photoshop, DPP, Firefox, Skype, iTunes all simultaneously... and the best part is that I didn't have to worry about Photoshop crashing while stitching a panorama together!
I know! It made my laptop feel like an entirely new machine, even with its pitiful RAM and old CPU. The SSD is literally the best investment you can make for a laptop. I hold onto such an old laptop because I like the screen, the fact that it's an IBM/Lenovo Thinkpad, and of course: the SSD.