rhd
0
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2010
- Messages
- 8,469
- Points
- 0
The laser you sent me Ablaze most definitely has a TO-3 diode in it. NOT a TO-18. I didn't do a full teardown on it since it doesn't belong to me. However.. it's not hard to tell by unscrewing the lens and looking at the visible part of the can/diode window. it's much smaller than a TO-18..
TO-3? Now I'm really confused. TO-3 is considerably larger than a TO-18, and often contains an entire C-Mount embedded inside of it.
Actually, all diodes should demonstrate this behavior, since it's a function of the cavity size increasing as the temperature goes up.. It just might not be as prevalent in low power diodes due to their inability to handle as much current, and therefor generate as much heat.
This is also true for reds.. I imagine if people start measuring these 300mW 635nm diodes when overdriven to 600-700mW.. They'd find they're considerably higher than 635.. Wouldn't surprise me if they weren't up in the 640's. Granted it's still better than overdriven 660s, which can end up over 670.
The Mitsubishi 635s hit 642 or so at around 1A. Quite a shift. Cyparagon's third chart (here) is quite telling. Push them to 1.5A, and you've basically got a 650nm diode!
That said, I was fairly certain that even 445 multi-mode diodes only wavered a nm or two as a result of current and heat increase. IE, the natural (random seeming) variance from diode to diode is substantially larger than the wavelength shift that you'll experience per diode as temperature and current increases.
That was my understanding, but I won't put that out there as fact. I haven't calibrated my spectrometer yet, so I'm just relying on second hand info.
Last edited: