Re: 405nm AR glass lenses - fit AixiZ FEELER
rkcstr said:
>30% increase in power? That's freakin AWESOME! [smiley=2vrolijk_08.gif]
I think you need to order me some NOW ;D
Unfortunatelly no, it's not a 30% increase... If my diode was like yours and only did 140mW at 150mA, then yes, the increase would be higher, but this particular 4x diode is doing 164mW after acrylics, when the power after glass is 202mW. So it's a 23% increase.. Read why above in the edite post..
When it warms up, this particular 4x diode has a higher wavelength than my hand picked high wl PHR!
If i find some low wl. 4x's the power increase will be higher, yes. Theoretically it is possible, that your 4x was also doing 200mW at 150mA, but had a shorter wavelength, causing there to be more losses than with my first test subject.. Cos i was aiming for 200mW raw output when i selected 150mA... I used your graph but assumed higher losses from the data that was reported in the GB thread.. But surprisingly enough, even tho the power after an acrylic was higher than expected, the power with glass was exactly what i was aiming for..
Just like with the PHRs, the power increase will vary with wavelength. It even changes with the temperature, cos the wl drifts with temp and the longer it is, the less losses there are in acrylics. But i have not yet seen less than 21% of increase...
Unlike with the 6x, i have 13 4x's here, so i can establish a range... We shall see..
EDIT: Umm, how did you get 30%? If the diode was like the one in your graph, and do 197mW after glass, the increase would be 43%...
Now that i have seen the beam profile myself, i don't think we will see >30% anywhere but with short wl. PHRs. PHRs have higher losses due to the bad aspect ratio. Unless of course there are 4x's with very low wavelength.... This first one i tested seems rather high, compared to what i heard from other tests. It surpassed even my high wl. PHR, and the better aspect ratio causes there to be similar losses as with 6x's..