Welcome to Laser Pointer Forums - discuss green laser pointers, blue laser pointers, and all types of lasers

LPF Donation via Stripe | LPF Donation - Other Methods

Links below open in new window

ArcticMyst Security by Avery

Poll: What do you want to see in a Power Meter?

What type do you want to see most?

  • The super kenometer

    Votes: 8 14.8%
  • The usb kenometer

    Votes: 33 61.1%
  • Regular kenometer with pc interface

    Votes: 13 24.1%

  • Total voters
    54





Joined
Mar 10, 2009
Messages
878
Points
0
I think that a USB kenometer would be awsome!

I've always been quite "cheap" when it comes to my laser stuff (ya, my budget is low).
 
Joined
May 4, 2009
Messages
2,238
Points
83
Answering post title:

1. Sensor head
2. Digital read out
3. On/Off switch

Its that simple :D
 

Kenom

0
Joined
May 4, 2007
Messages
5,629
Points
63
you don't want a zero button/knob? Makes it kinda difficult if your readings are off because you started your measurement when the readout was +6mw to begin with.

Answering post title:

1. Sensor head
2. Digital read out
3. On/Off switch

Its that simple :D
 
Joined
Mar 10, 2009
Messages
878
Points
0
If the kenometer requirers software, then please make it Mac compatible!

That would work better than on my windows XP partition.

Just a simple software with a power indicator, a "set to zero" option, a peak reading and a "start recording" and "stop recording" for charts.


That would be awesome.
 
Joined
Sep 20, 2008
Messages
17,622
Points
113
@BuildAbluraylaser...

What's with your crazy Fonts... can barely read the last post....

BTW... who uses a mac for other than multimedia stuff and games...
A PC is for serious work... like graphing Lasers...:whistle::san:


@SmurfT....
What did you "kinda" think already had a USB connection...:thinking:


Jerry
 
Last edited:
Joined
Mar 10, 2009
Messages
878
Points
0
@Lasersbee

I'm just trying to be original....

I prefer working on my Mac because it's twice as fast as windows.


I have a lot of hope for a USB Kenometer.
 
Joined
Apr 11, 2008
Messages
170
Points
0
@BuildAbluraylaser...

What's with your crazy Fonts... can barely read the last post....

BTW... who uses a mac for other than multimedia stuff and games...
A PC is for serious work... like graphing Lasers...:whistle::san:


@SmurfT....
What did you "kinda" think already had a USB connection...:thinking:


Jerry

Well everyone always talks about them having graphing capabilities. I KINDA thought that meant you plug it into your computer and it graphs it onto your screen....
 

daguin

0
Joined
Mar 29, 2008
Messages
15,989
Points
113
I want a BIG thermopile so I don't have to aim.

IMG_0639.jpg

Is that too much to ask? :whistle:

Peace,
dave
 
Joined
Dec 26, 2007
Messages
6,129
Points
0
Maybe an auto-set feature? (Like auto-calibration for the environment it is currently situated in)... Also, add a D-pad and two buttons + Tetris
 

Kenom

0
Joined
May 4, 2007
Messages
5,629
Points
63
hahaha tetris. Auto zero would be fail.

Imagine the thing starts zerooing itself WHILE the laser is pointed at it. "whatya mean this laser is zero mW?" wouldn't work very well.

Nice idea though.
 
Joined
Jul 1, 2009
Messages
1,679
Points
0
hahaha tetris. Auto zero would be fail.

Imagine the thing starts zerooing itself WHILE the laser is pointed at it. "whatya mean this laser is zero mW?" wouldn't work very well.

Nice idea though.

I built my auto zeroing meter a while back, and I got the same results as you mentioned ken:

DSC00588.jpg
 

HIMNL9

0
Joined
May 26, 2009
Messages
5,318
Points
0
I want a BIG thermopile so I don't have to aim.

IMG_0639.jpg

Is that too much to ask? :whistle:

Peace,
dave

LOL ..... first, what the hell is that, an ophir 1KW head ? ..... :D

second, there you see how a real laser hobbyst live ..... i mean, look the rests of the breakfast in the little dish, in the left up corner ..... :p :D

j/k ;)


BTW, Ken, no auto-zero, not if it's not started from the user, with a button, anyway ..... but, if the space is not a problem, and if you're thinking about a high precision version, a separate enclosure with a thermal stabilizer for the head, can be an add-on that can worth the efforts (but only for high precision and stability work, not for quick measures :p)

And it don't need to be a peltier cooler, anyway ..... all that you need is keep ONE side of the sensor at a fixed temperature, for have a stable and precise readout ..... remember your old heads, that had a thermical stabilized heater on the back ?

Anyway, as far as i can see from the pic of the new head that you've posted, it have a so big thermal mass, compared with the mass of the sensor, that probably a simple box with a window for the beam (and, maybe, a short piece of tube in front, for take away convection and airflow problems) can be more than enough for grant precision and stability, for a normal usage .....
 




Top