grainde
0
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2012
- Messages
- 3,163
- Points
- 113
He allegedly hasnt endangered peoples lives...If you read though the article he only gave information on what techniques were used to gather information; the machine so to speak. He specifically stated that he did not release any information that could cause harm to others.
This is what I was getting at and have been from the start of this thread, It is all related:
:beer:
Edit: http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2013/jun/15/nsa-covert-surveillance-trap
First, he said: "Most of the secrets the CIA has are about people, not machines and systems, so I didn't feel comfortable with disclosures that I thought could endanger anyone". Secondly, the election of Barack Obama in 2008 gave him hope that there would be real reforms, rendering disclosures unnecessary.
Snowden said that he admires both Ellsberg and Manning, but argues that there is one important distinction between himself and the army private, whose trial coincidentally began the week Snowden's leaks began to make news.
"I carefully evaluated every single document I disclosed to ensure that each was legitimately in the public interest," he said. "There are all sorts of documents that would have made a big impact that I didn't turn over, because harming people isn't my goal. Transparency is."
He purposely chose, he said, to give the documents to journalists whose judgment he trusted about what should be public and what should remain concealed.
This is what I was getting at and have been from the start of this thread, It is all related:
For him, it is a matter of principle. "The government has granted itself power it is not entitled to. There is no public oversight. The result is people like myself have the latitude to go further than they are allowed to," he said.
But he believed that the value of the internet, along with basic privacy, is being rapidly destroyed by ubiquitous surveillance. "I don't see myself as a hero," he said, "because what I'm doing is self-interested: I don't want to live in a world where there's no privacy and therefore no room for intellectual exploration and creativity."
Once he reached the conclusion that the NSA's surveillance net would soon be irrevocable, he said it was just a matter of time before he chose to act. "What they're doing" poses "an existential threat to democracy", he said.
:beer:
Edit: http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2013/jun/15/nsa-covert-surveillance-trap
Last edited: