diachi
0
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2008
- Messages
- 9,700
- Points
- 113
Opinions are not verifiable. Numbers are. you say others have measured things, so you don't have to. By that logic, since others have done reviews, you don't have to.
"Amazing build quality" - what does this even mean? What are your standards for quality? How are you evaluating quality?
"Flawless light output" - what does this even mean? what are your standards for light output?
"BE has perfect optics" - what does this even mean? What are your standards for optics?
"Simplistic" - I guess I understand. Power button, and nothing else. But isn't this the case for virtually all pointers?
"Heavy, feels good in hand" - this is totally subjective. This evaluation would depend on your strength, your size, and your experience with similar objects. Mass in grams for example is not subjective.
"With the thin host, gets warm quickly" - so it's thin and heavy at the same time? What does this even mean? How thin? How warm? How quickly? How do each of these compare with other pointers?
All of these things could be said of a 4-figure "Hercules" model. All of these things could be said of most $5 chinese pointers as well. How descriptive can it be, if it describes almost all pointers there are?
Will you ever be satisfied with a review Cyp? :shhh: :crackup:
At this rate we're going to need beam profilers, 10W+ capable power meters, digital calipers, spectrometers and thermal imaging cameras. :na:
Just poking some fun, not disagreeing with you, I see what you're saying.