- Jul 17, 2009
Glad you like it!
I added everything I really needed except for one thing - exporting the selection box. I'm pretty sure I won't add enough to justify a fork, and TBH I'm not sure I'll keep developing it at all... my free time keeps shrinking all the time.
OTOH I gree it will be annoying to merge. Have you changed much since the version I used as base?
Your code wasn't that hard, don't worry
BTW great work on Peregrine!
Hm... exporting the selection box is a really neat idea!
- I've changed export to work whenever the user wants.
- I expanded the OpenLPM protocol.
...actually that's it. I thought there was more. Seems silly to have them bulleted... oh well.
I think I need to go through your code and become better acquainted with it. It's always tough to pick up in someone else's code, but I think I can do it - especially if all your changes are well-received, which I think they will be. I think in the meantime, you should release a beta of it. You could spin off a new thread or I can put it in the OP.
We've just got to make sure the issue I had on my other laptop is fixable. Hopefully it's just my laptop.
Sorry to post and run the other day but I only had a short time to mess with it before having to get things ready for the Fourth weekend.
It works pretty well but I have run into where it stops logging half way through a timed graph on multiple occasions. There's an example of it in my 473 review thread. Other than that it runs pretty darned well.
Hm. If you go into the package itself, go to the /data/ folder (I forget the full path) and turn debug mode on in Peregrine.conf. That will give you detailed information about everything that Peregrine is doing. You'll also want to turn on the serial debugger.
If you can reproduce the bug and provide a screenshot of the debug information and a copy of the serial datastream around the time it occurred, that will go a long way toward me getting to the bottom of it.
Thanks for helping improve Peregrine!