- Joined
- Feb 25, 2010
- Messages
- 1,643
- Points
- 113
Well....Thanx Steve001......I have no formal training in Optics but am always very eager to learn and learn !! SO....Far Field is when the beam geometry is 1.4 times the initial LD diameter. OK...good to learn the proper definition ! To me....that is not really to far.... SO...Most of out LD's have an initial OD of say...2.5MM....SO....the Far Field would be when X or Y axis exceeds 5.0mm ?? That geometry happens relatively quickly...Or, have I over simplified this ??
I need to study this more. It is not surprising that there are well defined terms for almost every aspect of Optics. I do not now or have ever presented myself as an expert in Optics. Just a Hack with much to learn....and a passion for tinkering with this stuff !!
That said....I suppose we need to explore this area of beam viewing at various distances. The NDG7475 + G8...when the beam geometry is examined at say 13M appears to be fairly compact, almost round. BUT....when the beam geometry is noted at ...say 100M....well.....if one can see detail at that distance...the shape is more recognizable as a rectangle. When the beam is viewed at a skyward angle ( Never do this )….Parallax view takes command...and the beam again appears thin and compact. SO.....I guess....beam geometry all depends on the distance to where the beam terminates and our human perception !!
CDBeam
I need to study this more. It is not surprising that there are well defined terms for almost every aspect of Optics. I do not now or have ever presented myself as an expert in Optics. Just a Hack with much to learn....and a passion for tinkering with this stuff !!
That said....I suppose we need to explore this area of beam viewing at various distances. The NDG7475 + G8...when the beam geometry is examined at say 13M appears to be fairly compact, almost round. BUT....when the beam geometry is noted at ...say 100M....well.....if one can see detail at that distance...the shape is more recognizable as a rectangle. When the beam is viewed at a skyward angle ( Never do this )….Parallax view takes command...and the beam again appears thin and compact. SO.....I guess....beam geometry all depends on the distance to where the beam terminates and our human perception !!
CDBeam