Well, I hope so, ordered some of those diodes and already have the PWM module and driver which will accept pulse width modulation Redcowboy recommended. I've seen pulse modulated DPSS lasers look much brighter with higher peak power when pulsed, I'm hopeful these diodes will look brighter too.
Anyone here with experience pulsing visible wavelength diodes? I don't know why a manufacturer would make a 639 nm red diode at this power output to be pulsed unless it does make a big difference. Regardless, if you can keep the diode cooled to 25C with a TEC, the article I read shows they can produce over 5 watts output CW and last for thousands of hours, good enough for me!
According to the article, the reason this particular diode can produce double the rated output and still last that long is due to the three beams, since the power is split between three beams, the emitter output mirrors for each do not degrade very quickly when the output is doubled beyond design as it would with a single emitter diode being pushed that much over the design power, due to lower power density into the mirror. For example, each emitter this diode has is 60 um wide for a total of 180 um, the single emitter 2 watt 638 nm pulse LD this company produces has only a 40 um diameter emitter, so even at 2 watts there is far more power density into the output mirror deposited upon the LD emitter substrate. The study tried to see how well that diode would perform being pushed hard too, it died a toasted death very quickly from damage to its integral mirror. Compared to Mit's 2.1 watt single emitter 638 nm pulse diode, there is one more plus for this 3 beam diode, due to its wider emitters, they each have lower thermal resistance to the mounting structure inside the 9 mm housing, so don't get as hot for a given amount of input power to each of them.
Only thing is, this diode produces 3 beams, but I find that novel, like it. Something to be aware of, prior to collimation the output is like 70 degrees wide on one side and very thin on the other polarity. Due to this, unless using a short focal length lens, a 6.33 mm diameter lens like we commonly use in our pointers may not do well with it and truncate or cut off *some of the output power. So, unless using a very short FL 6.3 mm diameter lens such as a G2 (with about a 2 mm focal length) too much power might be lost, but I'm not even sure of that, maybe it will block far too much of the diode output.
If the G2 will allow all three beams to escape the small lens holder barrel, it would be moot to me anyway, still a poor choice of collimation lens because with such a short FL lens the divergence is going to be hell, horrible, crappy, shitty beyond comparison.... so my thought for pointer use is to use a 25.4 mm/1 inch diameter lens or larger with this diode.
Another issue for pointers though is the wide stripe each of the three beams will produce in the distance, quickly loosing visual power before the beam gets very far away, not to mention red wavelengths are so much less brilliant to our eyes at any power level, you still have that drawback. Beam shaping can help with the thin beam shape, but if you want to change the beam shape from a thin rectangle to more of a square shape, where can we get some cylinder pairs good for 9 to 10X expansion of the thin side which are fairly wide for all three beams? I guess we would have to use a prism pair, or more, those can be added to, just add more of them but at the cost of power from added loss.