It is Here.!!!!! 300mW "635nm" Mitsubishi.....

[jayrob]

Hmmm... Surprising!

This wavelength gives just about the same power with 405-G-1 vs 650-G-1...

Maybe just about 7 or 8mW's less. (@ 450mA's current for my test comparison)

Edit: From lens tests that I did a while back with a LOC, there is about a 5% difference with 650-G-1 vs 405-G-1...
http://laserpointerforums.com/f49/power-comparisons-different-lenses-red-blu-ray-33965.html

I guess it's still about that same difference with this 'orange' diode...

But a way bigger difference vs AR acrylic. :thinking:

 

[chipdouglas]

^^^^ maybe i missed it but how many mW's does it put out with the 650 g1?

 

[bennett326]

^^^^ maybe i missed it but how many mW's does it put out with the 650 g1?

he said 315mW on the previous page at 450ma:beer:

 

[rocket689]

Hmmm... Surprising!

This wavelength gives just about the same power with 405-G-1 vs 650-G-1...

Maybe just about 7 or 8mW's less. (@ 450mA's current for my test comparison)

That's great to know.

Thanks for the results, Jay! :thanks:

 

[InfinitusEquitas]

Hmmm... Surprising!

This wavelength gives just about the same power with 405-G-1 vs 650-G-1...

Maybe just about 7 or 8mW's less. (@ 450mA's current for my test comparison)

Thanks for checking Jay. Those are some interesting results... now I need to wait for payday and order a g1 PM incoming (on saturday).

 

[jayrob]

Thanks for checking Jay. Those are some interesting results... now I need to wait for payday and order a g1 PM incoming (on saturday).

Got you covered...

From lens tests that I did a while back with a LOC, there is about a 5% difference with 650-G-1 vs 405-G-1...
http://laserpointerforums.com/f49/power-comparisons-different-lenses-red-blu-ray-33965.html

I guess it's still about that same difference with this 'orange' diode...

But a way bigger difference vs AR acrylic. :thinking:

 

[lazeerer]

Alright Guys,

Last night i shot a single video for you to see the difference in power on My laser between the AR coated Acrylic Red lens and one of Jayrob's Killer 405-G-1 Lens.:eg:

Unfortunately i do not own a Jayrob 650-G-1 lens to test with but he had some result listed above.

I think this is going to make you guys: :drool: It sure made me.:beer:

First Part of the Video is the Test with the AR coated Acrylic Lens...
Second Part is with Jayrob's 405-G1 lens.

For the First minute and a Half I forgot it on Macro but i realized it and Switch it to Normal. Sorry about that.

As you can See the Insane power increase. 150mW more Power is a Nice amount and can tell the difference Quit a Bit.

The Lens is Well Worth it.

Now to get the Right Prism to fix this Beam.:eg:

It also Seems to clean up alot of the Artifacts around the Dot "line" that the Acrylic Lens Gave.

Man Iam Excited even more now. I dont think i will be putting this G1 back into my 2W Arctic. I will Just have to buy another one for it.:crackup:

Iam Enjoying this laser much more now.:wave:

 

[Fiddy]

550mW :drool:

 

[chipdouglas]

the driver is set at 475ma????? yikes. you got a hot one man.


michael.

 

[lazeerer]

the driver is set at 475ma????? yikes. you got a hot one man.


michael.

Still at 475mA my friend.:wave: Yes Iam Starting to believe this myself now. As I dont see anyone get close to that.

Hopefully my Second one is as Good.:eg: "Knock on Wood"

 

[jayrob]

Alright Guys,

Last night i shot a single video for you to see the difference in power on My laser between the AR coated Acrylic Red lens and one of Jayrob's Killer 405-G-1 Lens.:eg:

Unfortunately i do not own a Jayrob 650-G-1 lens to test with but he had some result listed above.

I think this is going to make you guys: :drool: It sure made me.:beer:

First Part of the Video is the Test with the AR coated Acrylic Lens...
Second Part is with Jayrob's 405-G1 lens.

For the First minute and a Half I forgot it on Macro but i realized it and Switch it to Normal. Sorry about that.

As you can See the Insane power increase. 150mW more Power is a Nice amount and can tell the difference Quit a Bit.

The Lens is Well Worth it.

Now to get the Right Prism to fix this Beam.:eg:

It also Seems to clean up alot of the Artifacts around the Dot "line" that the Acrylic Lens Gave.

Man Iam Excited even more now. I dont think i will be putting this G1 back into my 2W Arctic. I will Just have to buy another one for it.:crackup:

Iam Enjoying this laser much more now.:wave:

Wow that''s nearly a 40% increase in power vs AR acrylic!

I measured a 30% increase, but maybe with more output, the increase is more??

Not sure, but that is awesome!

 

[bennett326]

that's a incredible difference holy :">?#R@:drool::drool:

EDIT: must spread rep before giving it to jayrob for his awesome lens

 

[lazeerer]

Wow that''s nearly a 40% increase in power vs AR acrylic!

I measured a 30% increase, but maybe with more output, the increase is more??

Not sure, but that is awesome!

Yes you see it how i see it. ~37% Increase. Thats why i did it back to back.

The G1 Lens Sits so Close to the 635nm Diode. its more closer then when using the 405-G1 on a 445nm Diode. I would have thought it would stick out further like when using a 405-G1 on a LPC.

 

[jayrob]

The 650-G-1 should be about 5% better vs 405-G-1 per my measurements. But that's not a huge difference. Some though...

Also, the 650-G-1 is not as close focus in design vs the 405-G-1. Still a close focus design, just not quite as much as the 405-G-1...

 

[lazeerer]

I have not been able to buy one of your famous 650-G1's.

Its on the list to buy though. All i have a 405-G1 "2" & "1" G2...

But none the less these are the best lenses on the Market Ive seen and are well worth it.:wave:

 

[Tech_Junkie]

I have not been able to buy one of your famous 650-G1's.

Its on the list to buy though. All i have a 405-G1 "2" & "1" G2...

But none the less these are the best lenses on the Market Ive seen and are well worth it.:wave:

Maybe Jay will give you a good rate for being a good customer, and providing all the info he asked for.