- Joined
- Nov 24, 2007
- Messages
- 2,735
- Points
- 0
Re: FS: 405-G-1 Glass Lens Mod-28% Increase vs Aix
Nice!
I would get one if it weren't for Igor's GB...
Nice!
I would get one if it weren't for Igor's GB...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Spyderz20x6 said:I would get one if it weren't for Igor's GB...
rkcstr said:Yeah, really, not a concern for me. I LOVE the thinner beam and now having an extra 65mW from nothing (well, aside from the cost of the lens) ;D
Now, if only I could recreate Dave's findings... [goes to contemplate spending $200 on an 8x drive to get himself 1/2W of 405nm] [smiley=evil.gif]
Traveller said:[quote author=Spyderz20x6 link=1237515270/16#16 date=1237590130]I would get one if it weren't for Igor's GB...
jayrob said:Hey Dave, I had one person tell me that they don't like the lens...
I personally don't mind the 'splash' because it is only noticeable to me if I am looking at the dot at close distance, or if it is out of focus...
What is your opinion?
Jay
Thx a bunch, Jay, PM sentjayrob said:...but I will do it for you!
Thx a bunch, Jay, PM sentTraveller said:[quote author=jayrob link=1237515270/16#20 date=1237598112] ...but I will do it for you!
rkcstr said:I don't see why you would be unhappy with this lens. The gain in power is awesome, and since the beam comes out so much more concentrated, it is more visible AND burns things more easily I could pop a balloon from about 20-30 feet with the collimated beam of my 6x at 200mA [smiley=evil.gif]
leukoplast said:BTW, is there a way to figure out how many mW's are being wasted in all the splatter? Also, do all glass lenses do this? For example, IgorT's lenses that he is doing a GB for? Or a Meridith glass lens? And why is there splatter anyway? Is that just the true form of what the laser is really putting out?
daguin said:[highlight]EVERY lens, glass or acrylic, produces some uncollimated light. [/highlight] Single element lenses are worse (especially with an "open" back) because the light from the diode is entering the lens from different directions. In the "splatter" you are seeing not only the errant parts of the light from the window of the diode (light bounces around inside the diode can too), but also the errant light that is being reflected around in the module before entering the lens.
[highlight]I have seen MUCH worse. [/highlight] In one of my comments I stated that the person who was not satisfied (I don't know if it was you) had obviously never seen a Merideth. The Merideth is MUCH worse. Also, this "splatter" is the main reason behind IgorT's multiple lens rejections in his research. My IgorT version #1 lens is so bad you can barely pick out the beam from the splatter! For a single element glass lens, this is very good. I most certainly am not trying to convince you to "accept" the lens, just trying to answer your questions and comments.
With the "normal" AixiZ acrylic this errant light (that leads to splatter) is the reason that the rear of the lens has a small aperture (that we usually open up). [highlight]The beam is artificially "round" because of mechanical restriction NOT optical quality. [/highlight]This "rounder" beam is "bought" at the expense of output. With the greens it is the reason that the beam is shined through a aperture.
We have not seen IgorT's selection yet, so we cannot say what it looks like. It is the best one he could find. He rejected several along the way.
Peace,
dave