- Joined
- Sep 20, 2008
- Messages
- 17,635
- Points
- 113
When i get my laser, I will carry my 1W Blue laser around. One flash and hurty eyes.
What are you.... like 9 years old...:thinking:
Get with the program....:undecided:
Jerry
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
When i get my laser, I will carry my 1W Blue laser around. One flash and hurty eyes.
When i get my laser, I will carry my 1W Blue laser around. One flash and prision time and a hefty fine, plus a crimnal record.
When i get my laser, I will carry my 1W Blue laser around. One flash and hurty eyes.
I'm not kidding ..... a year or so ago, here, a jeweler got robbed, and the robber shooted him escaping ..... the jeweler replied to fire, but the robber was turning, so the bullet hit him from the side (side, not shoulders), and killed him ..... the judges charged the jeweler for "voluntary homicide" (i think in the USA is defined "first degree homicide", but i'm not sure about the definition), sentencing that when the bullet hit the robber, it was turning for escape, so the jeweler had "no valid reasons for shoot him" (this, after the robbery and after the robber shooted the jeweler)
EDIT: also pepper sprays here are almost banned ..... only some types allowed ..... and stun-guns are illegals too![]()
If you want to carry a tool capable of permanently harming at attacker carry a Gun!. It is (federally) legal (in the US) to carry firearms as long as they are not concealed. If you carry a gun openly in a hip holster, not only are you within the law, but you are going to deter nearly every attacker who might want to do you harm. You may also get a concealed carry license if you don't want to display it. However, check your local laws before buying or carrying a firearm!
Sure, a laser may be a useful tool if it is the only means you have available, but intentionally choosing and carrying a laser for the purpose of self defense is a profoundly stupid idea!
1) If you intentionally blast someone in the eye with a 2W laser, you will do immediate and permanent damage to their retinas. Using a level of force which causes permanent damage is very near to the level of lethal force. If you seriously feel you NEED to permanently destroy someones eyesight in order to defend yourself, you would be equally justified in shooting them.
2) While lasers are capable of stunning or disabling an attacker, there are MUCH better tools available for the same purpose! Think about it; a laser emits what is basically a 1 dimensional beam of light. In order to be effective as a self defense tool, you would need to line that beam of light up with the the pupils of your attackers. If you shine it in his face, you might surprise him a little, but in order to disable him, you would need to hit BOTH of his pupils for a long enough duration to damage his retinas. In a real situation, this would be an extremely difficult thing to do.
@HIMNL9
That does bring up a good point. I am speaking of US law, it is important to know the laws where you live. That sounds like a terrible situation in Italy. The fact still remains however, that using a laser to permanently destroy the eyesight of an attacker (assuming you are able to hit him directly in the eyes, which is unikely) is a very high level of force. So, unless your attacker is armed with a firearm, you would be using excessive force. If pepper spay and stun guns are illegal, carry a powerful flashlight or a crescent wrench... not a laser.
Times ago, i built a "dazzler" with a green laser module, but this is a totally different thing ..... it was a 150mW module in a "cigarette size" box, modified for make a "rectangular" spot approx 10x20cm at 2 meters, and drived in quick pulses .....
do you think that this could be legal in Italy??
Well, it's a good question .....
TECHNICALLY speaking, it's no more a laser pointer, cause the lenses turns the "beam" in a large "conical rectangle" , and this is permanent, so the agents cannot claim you're using a laser pointer ..... but, i also seen so much bullshits in tribunal sentences, that probably a judge stupid enough can be found for sentence that you are still using a pointer just cause originally the module was designed for this ..... and this is also the reason for which the second experiment was done using a "phlatlight" led
It was looking a bit less "efficent" (at least at first sight) than green laser, but just cause green light is more "visible" than red ..... i can assure you that at night, when you get flashed, you need like 40 seconds or more for start to see again good..... less in daylight, cause the iris is already more "closed" than in night or darkness, but still it left a blue/green spot that need some time for disappear
![]()