rhd
0
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2010
- Messages
- 8,469
- Points
- 0
I don't know much about LOCs - the 658 (I thought) was common wisdom as relates to the wavelength we see based on our usage. Of course, that could be wrong. Surely someone knows?
I don't think I'll be shipping this guy off anywhere anytime soon. I just built him, and he's completely unique in my collection.
My curiosity is satisfied in that I now have a red portable that is much brighter than a LOC. That was my objective. Whether it's 660 at 1.5W or 630 at 100 mW really doesn't make a lot of difference to me - it's one of the brightest red portables I've seen.
My next objective is to kick this limit up even higher, with an HL6388MG. And again, it doesn't much matter to me what wavelength it hits on paper (or even how it compares in my relative brightness tool on spec). The objective for me is to outbright my previous best red, in a portable build. I'm not looking to burn things, and I'm not looking to wavelength collect (despite a slowly growing signature line).
Right now at least, what my eyes really crave, is as visible a red beam as possible
I don't think I'll be shipping this guy off anywhere anytime soon. I just built him, and he's completely unique in my collection.
My curiosity is satisfied in that I now have a red portable that is much brighter than a LOC. That was my objective. Whether it's 660 at 1.5W or 630 at 100 mW really doesn't make a lot of difference to me - it's one of the brightest red portables I've seen.
My next objective is to kick this limit up even higher, with an HL6388MG. And again, it doesn't much matter to me what wavelength it hits on paper (or even how it compares in my relative brightness tool on spec). The objective for me is to outbright my previous best red, in a portable build. I'm not looking to burn things, and I'm not looking to wavelength collect (despite a slowly growing signature line).
Right now at least, what my eyes really crave, is as visible a red beam as possible