- Joined
- Jun 18, 2012
- Messages
- 1,018
- Points
- 83
I happen to have used a dual driver so I can use the second one to drive the fan but I wonder how a driver will react to a voltage driven device. Never tried this. Wasteful but interesting. I will replace the fan with a 5v fan off a dead spectrometer. Looks like a fit. Other idea is put a a little tec on it.
Btw I ordered drivers from place called laserwinkle. Guess what I got....the exact drivers a guy called badpip was selling and then vanished. Nice driver. Im thinking of running my yellow with a 120hz modulation to see if I can see the beam and cut down on heat. For lumia it doesn’t matter if the beam is pulsed.
Themodulation test is in.....jelly bean hell. Not good for graphics use. Fine for beam shows.
Last, I can’t load up pictures here. They are always size rejected. Do I just resize tom800x600?
I put the yellow on the hr2000
The fundamental is 573 the pump has a couple peaks 932 and 976. the 976 is a small peak 8000:100 ratio then there is something wide from the base of the peak to 1100nm 500 counts. it real but maybe off the scalle 1100nm is my end. my bet is the large peak gives the 565 and the small peak the 575.
Btw I ordered drivers from place called laserwinkle. Guess what I got....the exact drivers a guy called badpip was selling and then vanished. Nice driver. Im thinking of running my yellow with a 120hz modulation to see if I can see the beam and cut down on heat. For lumia it doesn’t matter if the beam is pulsed.
Themodulation test is in.....jelly bean hell. Not good for graphics use. Fine for beam shows.
Last, I can’t load up pictures here. They are always size rejected. Do I just resize tom800x600?
I put the yellow on the hr2000
The fundamental is 573 the pump has a couple peaks 932 and 976. the 976 is a small peak 8000:100 ratio then there is something wide from the base of the peak to 1100nm 500 counts. it real but maybe off the scalle 1100nm is my end. my bet is the large peak gives the 565 and the small peak the 575.
Last edited: