Welcome to Laser Pointer Forums - discuss green laser pointers, blue laser pointers, and all types of lasers

Buy Site Supporter Role (remove some ads) | LPF Donations

Links below open in new window

FrozenGate by Avery

Uranium Glass Marbles?

If you have uranium marbles that aren't cracked, it's easy to crack them. Just heat them up with a propane torch or something until they're pretty hot (but not red-hot ), and then drop them in water. They will shatter but should hold together. I used to do that with regular marbles.
 





Radium on the other hand... ::) They used to use that for all sorts of glowy stuff.I think they replaced it with tritium now, which is safer, but appart from the DX keychain, tritium stuff is always expensive. ;D
 
Switch said:
Radium on the other hand... ::) They used to use that for all sorts of glowy stuff.I think they replaced it with tritium now, which is safer, but appart from the DX keychain, tritium stuff is always expensive. ;D
Click to expand...

DX tritium keychain? Where? I need!

-Mark
 
Lots of vaseline glass on ebay, including sometimes "bottoms-up" shot glasses:
 

Attachments

  • vshot.gif
    vshot.gif
    98.4 KB · Views: 2,991
rocketparrotlet said:
[quote author=Switch link=1225337223/20#33 date=1225783639]Radium on the other hand... ::) They used to use that for all sorts of glowy stuff.I think they replaced it with tritium now, which is safer, but appart from the DX keychain, tritium stuff is always expensive. ;D
Click to expand...

DX tritium keychain?  Where?  I need!

-Mark[/quote]
Here you go: http://www.dealextreme.com/details.dx/sku.6830
The Tritium itself doesn't glow.The little glass tube is coated with Phosphorus or something and it glows continuously as the Tritium decays.It should actually have a half life of 12 years.They're selling it as 10 year glowy thingy.
 
The really interesting question is what it would take to get the glass evenly doped, and have it cast as a ball lens, with 405nm antireflective coating. Sure, spherical aberration is unavoidable, but if the quality is okay, it will collimate a BR laser. You lose a fair bit of energy due to the fluorescence, but that is a small price to pay for the coolness of having a lens that glows green whenever the laser is on. Without AR coating and a smooth surface, the stray reflections might be unavoidable, though.
 
suiraM said:
The really interesting question is what it would take to get the glass evenly doped, and have it cast as a ball lens, with 405nm antireflective coating. Sure, spherical aberration is unavoidable, but if the quality is okay, it will collimate a BR laser. You lose a fair bit of energy due to the fluorescence, but that is a small price to pay for the coolness of having a lens that glows green whenever the laser is on. Without AR coating and a smooth surface, the stray reflections might be unavoidable, though.
Click to expand...
LoL that would be awesome :D
 
Ok! :D I'm not in wonder for the third arm, but for the hair.... they're just so few now..... :'(
This picture shows what we usually get due to cosmic radiation (1 mR/h = 10 mSv/h), I wouldn't be pleased to get more just for fun....
 

Attachments

  • Picture_9_001.jpg
    Picture_9_001.jpg
    147.9 KB · Views: 615
Don't worry about the hair, some people start loosing it at 25.It's perfectly normal and probably unrelated to radiation ;D

Does that counter say 0.07 or 0.01? Btw, that's pretty low according to the website. :P
 
The reading is 0.01 mR/h, and if this reading would be a constant value, it is NOT low! Due a simple calculation: this value is roughly equal to 0.1 mSv/h, in a day it means 2.4 mSv. In one year the value becomes 876 mSv! For good luck this is NOT a constant value, there are long periods of time in which there are no falling radiations.

Coming back to my question, I put it because I like to verify facts (if possible), not simple reading general statement. [smiley=thumbsup.gif]
 
FrancoRob said:
The reading is 0.01 mR/h, and if this reading would be a constant value, it is NOT low! Due a simple calculation: this value is roughly equal to 0.1 mSv/h, in a day it means 2.4 mSv. In one year the value becomes 876 mSv! For good luck this is NOT a constant value, there are long periods of time in which there are no falling radiations.

Coming back to my question, I put it because I like to verify facts (if possible), not simple reading general statement. [smiley=thumbsup.gif]
Click to expand...
FrancoRob,

Would you be able to measure the actual radiation from a set of the marbles? I would donate a set of my uranium-marbles to you in order to get a good measurment on them.
DH
 
Dark_Horse said:
[quote author=FrancoRob link=1225337223/40#43 date=1226004327]The reading is 0.01 mR/h, and if this reading would be a constant value, it is NOT low! Due a simple calculation: this value is roughly equal to 0.1 mSv/h, in a day it means 2.4 mSv. In one year the value becomes 876 mSv! For good luck this is NOT a constant value, there are long periods of time in which there are no falling radiations.

Coming back to my question, I put it because I like to verify facts (if possible), not simple reading general statement. [smiley=thumbsup.gif]
Click to expand...
FrancoRob,

Would you be able to measure the actual radiation from a set of the marbles? I would donate a set of my uranium-marbles to you in order to get a good measurment on them.
DH[/quote]

Well, the Geiger Counter I have is very sensitive, I have checked it near the Euratom, (European Atomic Research Center) that is no far from where I live, and the specialist found it fine. If these uranium-marbles emit radiations, I would be able to read them.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.


Back
Top