Sigurthr
0
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2011
- Messages
- 4,364
- Points
- 83
Well I do not think 100mW Over 18 only and requires Laser License would be fair sure there are a lot of immature teenagers out there but not all of them are, I myself am 16 and Therefore I would only be able to use a <99mw laser ? I would be fine with taking a laser safety class but I think the limit should be around <300mw minimum for under 18.
I mean no offense or disrespect to you at all when I say this: There are many factors which determine how irresponsible a person will be with a laser, but people of the sub-18 age group tend to exhibit most of them. In other words, I don't trust the average teenager to have the wisdom or logical thought processes neccessary to safely operate a high power laser.
I don't see why age should be a factor at all.
If you go for a licensing scheme, just passing the required exam should be sufficient to allow a person to operate a laser of the allowed power level that comes with it.
Age requirements help to discourage potential applicants and also it helps to make it even harder for someone younger to pass the exam. "Why bother even getting the license if I can only get 100mW!" In fact, now that I think about it 100mW may be too high for the under 18, perhaps 40mW is better, they can't burn anything then.
Benm said:In reality i doubt it would be effective though... i've taken and passed several required exams to work with things or in sectors (from radiological safety to running a bar) and found the mandatory exams to be extremely simple.
The kind of testing I had in mind was not that of drivers permit or hunting license or even your average safety exam. I had in mind something more akin to the Extra Class HAM exam - technically challenging enough and vast enough that your average joe who want's "a cool laser" cannot possibly pass it without doing a lot of reading.
You all do realize that if somebody even suggests laser laws to congress that every laser > class II would be banned from civilian ownership, right?
I would NEVER advocate approaching lawmakers with the idea to regulate or restrict our hobby unless it was already threatend with heavy unguided legislation. You're absolutely correct, they would rip them from our hands in a heartbeat. It is far easier for them to outlaw something than it is to regulate it. If we were given the choice of heavy regulation or outright banning I would advocate strict regulation. Those who REALLY want to take part in the hobby would only be inconvenienced initially and then would have a presentable proof of their eligibility and qualification to own and use lasers safely. Having a measureable base of registered and licensed users also helps to keep something legal. It gives clear-cut lines for lawmakers and police to focus on. No longer would it be hard for them to differentiate between us and the foolish stupid kids who cause all the problems for us.