VW
0
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2008
- Messages
- 577
- Points
- 0
Right, so it's confirmed that acrylic is ultimately better for 405nm than glass?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
VW said:Right, so it's confirmed that acrylic is ultimately better for 405nm than glass?
thejunkmonger said:probably depends on the type of coating I know on a lot of computer screens and tv screens the instructions say to not use alcohol because it will destroy the AR coating. I'll try when I get my lens I have some acetone and alcohol.
IgorT said:[quote author=thejunkmonger link=1209940381/270#271 date=1211128734]probably depends on the type of coating I know on a lot of computer screens and tv screens the instructions say to not use alcohol because it will destroy the AR coating. I'll try when I get my lens I have some acetone and alcohol.
john_lawson said:this is what ive got so far on my bluray waiting for another driver the 803-t doesn't run well on 38 ma going for the 80 ma range its a dx host 5 bucks you have to moddify switch housing a bit to fit 2 cr-123a non protected sorry about pic size
IgorT said:[quote author=VW link=1209940381/270#273 date=1211132921]Right, so it's confirmed that acrylic is ultimately better for 405nm than glass?
VW said:I see, thanks. So, what if you also had an IR filter? Would you see much of a decrease in power?
Glaserfan said:I was online thru yahoo with jake21, and his tests resulted in a 8mw(62 to70) gain by just changing to the Aixiz acrylic lens.
happytomato said:I sent aixiz an e-mail, I'll tell you when/if they respond.