Welcome to Laser Pointer Forums - discuss green laser pointers, blue laser pointers, and all types of lasers

Buy Site Supporter Role (remove some ads) | LPF Donations

Links below open in new window

ArcticMyst Security by Avery | Browser Hide by Avery

The 2024 Election is coming fast, share your thoughts on the issues here.

paul1598419 said:
What business successes? He had none! He was a failure at businsses as much as he was a failure as president. And, he's not added any policies that would benefit anyone except for the very rich.
Click to expand...

Stop lying paul, we know your TDS is eating your heart out.
 





julianthedragon said:
A very stable genius who solves the economy very bigly. Right
Click to expand...

Trump did much better than Biden and Harris is a fake with no business or economic accomplishments of her own, but tell us julian, what have you accomplished and how do you live, do you pay rent, buy groceries, pay property taxes ?

Trump has had his own business success, how does your business success compare ?
What would be your economic plan for the nation, would you tax your parents retirement savings to pay for socialism ?
Our nation is in a great deal of debt. So what would you do to remedy the situation and what social programs would you implement and how would you pay for it all ? Don't tell me you would tax the wealthy, that's a pipe dream that could never pay for universal healthcare/housing/income and I mean not a single one of those concepts.

It's actually quite humorous when you think about democrats taxing Sorros, Bloomberg and Zuckerburg enough to help pay for social programs such as universal healthcare/income/housing because we know that's not going to happen.
Democrats wouldn't even pass any tax laws without loopholes for their wealthy contributors.
 
RedCowboy said:
Trump did much better than Biden and Harris is a fake with no business or economic accomplishments of her own, but tell us julian, what have you accomplished and how do you live, do you pay rent, buy groceries, pay property taxes ?

Trump has had his own business success, how does your business success compare ?
What would be your economic plan for the nation, would you tax your parents retirement savings to pay for socialism ?
Our nation is in a great deal of debt. So what would you do to remedy the situation and what social programs would you implement and how would you pay for it all ? Don't tell me you would tax the wealthy, that's a pipe dream that could never pay for universal healthcare/housing/income and I mean not a single one of those concepts.

It's actually quite humorous when you think about democrats taxing Sorros, Bloomberg and Zuckerburg enough to help pay for social programs such as universal healthcare/income/housing because we know that's not going to happen.
Democrats wouldn't even pass any tax laws without loopholes for their wealthy contributors.
Click to expand...

How many times are you going to repost this? I think three is enough.
 
RedCowboy said:
Trump did much better than Biden and Harris is a fake with no business or economic accomplishments of her own, but tell us julian, what have you accomplished and how do you live, do you pay rent, buy groceries, pay property taxes ?

Trump has had his own business success, how does your business success compare ?
What would be your economic plan for the nation, would you tax your parents retirement savings to pay for socialism ?
Our nation is in a great deal of debt. So what would you do to remedy the situation and what social programs would you implement and how would you pay for it all ? Don't tell me you would tax the wealthy, that's a pipe dream that could never pay for universal healthcare/housing/income and I mean not a single one of those concepts.

It's actually quite humorous when you think about democrats taxing Sorros, Bloomberg and Zuckerburg enough to help pay for social programs such as universal healthcare/income/housing because we know that's not going to happen.
Democrats wouldn't even pass any tax laws without loopholes for their wealthy contributors.
Click to expand...
Give me a sec, I’ll respond after I finish making dinner using my groceries in my apartment
 
You know, Merrich Garland's DOJ indicting another Democrat is just proof that Donald Trump wasn't singled out for prosecution. Everyone gets his time in court, and if guilty, will be found so.
 
Last edited:
paul1598419 said:
You know, Merrich Garland's DOJ indicting another Democrat is just proof that Donald Trump wasn't singled out for prosecution. Everyone gets his time in court, and if guilty, will be found so.
Click to expand...

No, Trump is a victim of political lawfare and Adams may be as well, Adams was likely told to retire but refused...... remember when Cuomo said he would not resign.... then days later he " changed his mind " the deep state is dirty as hell, they will invent something to take you down with if you don't comply.

 
Last edited:
Maybe. Or if you're very dumb like Trump, then they don't even need to invent anything. Trump, the poor poor victim. He's the best victim. many people are saying this

 
Last edited:
Shakenawake said:
Maybe. Or if you're very dumb like Trump, then they don't even need to invent anything. Trump, the poor poor victim. He's the best victim. many people are saying this

Click to expand...

Nucular. That is something he has said. Just don't drop the soap in the prison shower. :LOL:
 
Last edited:
Yea it's real funny, a big joke..... I bet you wouldn't think it was funny if a Republican State AG who ran for office on " I'm gonna get Obama " charged Obama ( while he was running for reelection ) with a past the statute of limitations State book keeping misdemeanor and bootstrapped it into 34 felonies, denied a change of venue when 85% of jurors were supporters of the other candidate and said AG brought in a special judge not on the roster who hated Obama and had a conflict of interest...... I bet you would be singing a different tune, so what's that make you ?

download


hypocrisy-meter.gif
 
Last edited:
85% of the jury supported Biden? Dang, if only trump's lawyers had an opportunity to reject some of them, like in some sort of selection process or something. Oh wait.... they did

Also, 85% huh? So 10.2 of them. So that means only 1.8 jurors were not biden supporters according to you. How can one person be only 80% non-biden supporting, or how can one person be 20% biden supporting? If according to your fantasy land beliefs it is 10 biden supporting jurors and you don't want to use decimals in your percentage, then 83% is what you should say. (It would be 83.3 repeating technically)
 
Last edited:
Trump was fairly tried and convicted. He is now a convict. It likely won't be the last time either. Why in the world would you run a convicted criminal? It's your own fault really. Judge Chutkan is holding an evidentiary hearing. We may acually see much of Jack Smith's case before the election.
 
Shakenawake said:
85% of the jury supported Biden? Dang, if only trump's lawyers had an opportunity to reject some of them, like in some sort of selection process or something. Oh wait.... they did

Also, 85% huh? So 10.2 of them. So that means only 1.8 jurors were not biden supporters according to you. How can one person be only 80% non-biden supporting, or how can one person be 20% biden supporting? If according to your fantasy land beliefs it is 10 biden supporting jurors and you don't want to use decimals in your percentage, then 83% is what you should say. (It would be 83.3 repeating technically)
Click to expand...

The original jury pool was 200 people 170 were Biden supporters, 170/200 = 85%

p.s. It's amazing the amount of disinformation/misinformation with the election getting close, because before Trumps hush money trial there were articles everywhere about the deep blue jury pool, but now there's so called debunking of what was the news, amazing.

" Half of prospective Trump jurors said they can’t be impartial. "​



 
Last edited:
RedCowboy said:
The original jury pool was 200 people 170 were Biden supporters, 170/200 = 85%

p.s. It's amazing the amount of disinformation/misinformation with the election getting close, because before Trumps hush money trial there were articles everywhere about the deep blue jury pool, but now there's so called debunking of what was the news, amazing.

" Half of prospective Trump jurors said they can’t be impartial. "​



Click to expand...

I don't know where you get your information about the jury, but that Biden v Trump isn't available anywhere. The press wasn't allowed to know what the politics of jurors might have been. I suppose some speculated, but that is just that...spectulation. No one knows what the politics of the jurors were. Also, Trump's lawyers were allowed to strike jurors without cause as often as the prosecution was and neither used all of them. Trump is to blame for the case put on for his defense. He was too caught up in the optics for the election than his case.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.





Back
Top