- Joined
- Aug 30, 2008
- Messages
- 6,891
- Points
- 83
Violence, rape and murder are all acts that harm another human being. Deciding to use mind altering substances(assuming that they don't cause you to become violent or do harmful things like heroin/meth/crack etc) hurts nobody. Who is the government to tell you whether or not you can smoke a plant that grows from the ground?
As far as changing the laws is concerned the government doesn't care much. They care more about their corporate buddies and pleasing the right people. The cotton/pharma/paper/chemical industries are all terrified of legal hemp/mj and they do everything in their power to buy off those in power. The whole reason it was made illegal to begin with was because some guy in charge of the federal narcotics bureau had ties to the paper industry and they started a big fear and propaganda campaign to terrify the public. Here's some of the reasoning behind the illegality of pot.
Harry J. Anslinger:
Reefer makes darkies think they're as good as white men.
Harry J. Anslinger:
Marijuana is an addictive drug which produces in its users insanity, criminality, and death.
Harry J. Anslinger:
You smoke a joint and you're likely to kill your brother.
Richard Nixon:
That’s a funny thing, every one of the bastards that are out for legalizing marijuana is Jewish
-Sorry for the big rant, but this has always been an annoying issue for me. Our country has so many important problems that could use the energy and resources that are wasted on this pointless prohibition and that's not even mentioning all of the legitimate uses for the product in question.
The government does have the right to tell us if we can grow something and smoke it, that's what they're elected for, is to make the rules. I'm not arguing whether weed is bad or harmful, as I don't think it is. I think it has legitimate medical purposes. However, smoking weed for the sake of getting high is not a legitimate purpose.
Obviously this Harry J. Anslinger is a retarded douche bag.