Hi Red,
I did not understand what did you mean by "avoid wave fronts from cancelling out", but to my honest knowlegde polarizing breamsplitters are not very wavelength sensitive. E.g. on Thorlabs graphs page there is no PBS for 445nm (which ones I am using at the moment from other suppliers), but one for 405nm has broad range around stated 405nm.
About not using a waveplate to combine MM beams: it might be possible if both beams are cylindrically expanded before PBS combining in the way they have same spots (square or rectangular). But this would make the set more complicated (you add another pair of cylindricals instead of one WP and the total cost can result higher.
BTW I have added more pictures in the 465nm Blaster thread.
You and Alaskan have just +repped me for old 14W thread - now I have to make some pictures of that beam, too. But remember - this is not a portable device and the beam is only 3x expanded. I did not receive 6x cylindricals from Glutton yet.
Hi Diachi,
I have ordered this new 445/462nm dicro from Phil at Live lasersystems - it will cost me 134EUR incl. VAT and shipping (the life in EU is expensive you know). If it really works as expected, an up to 20W beam could be possible without knife-edging.
I also saw that Kvant sells modules with 445+462 beam, so this must be possiible to do:
https://www.kvantlasers.sk/product/16w-445-460-nm-kvant-laser-module.
But there is one point LL guys and Mateusz from Optlasers wrote to me: WP designed for 445nm would only rotate 465nm beam 80° (not 90°), so some losses are to consider unless I use a WP specially designed for 465nm... We will see.