- Joined
- Apr 26, 2010
- Messages
- 4,175
- Points
- 83
What is within reason to you may not be in reason to me and vice versa... lets talk about the "trench" lets say ive been in it and you havent. what about astronauts that see earth from space, but i cant see 5 miles down the freeway because of all the smog. You see, it is all about an individuals own ability to understand and rationalize. as for the infinite numbers between 0 and 1, i will always see it as finite. but mathmaticians clearly see it infinite. the green highlighted green part is something that doesn't make sense. Every thing is "new and unorthodox" to every body at some point. so by your logic no body can learn anything ever? so because a person isn't able to see beyond, isn't fair to say words are meaningless. because to me they mean everything.
michael.
What I meant by the trench thing, was that if I wasn't there, then I couldn't explain it. I'm trying to explain a theory. Words are meaningless here because it's just what that person THINKS. What would have REAL meaning is actual proof of what is really out there. I mean words are meaningless because they hold no solid ground in this instance, they have no backbone, they are just that persons mental depiction of what he/she believes might be in the trench, or on Neptune, or at the boundries of the Universe. And no, I'm not saying you cannot learn, but things that are truely mind-boggling, and extrordinary. Not a new species of fish, or a new dinosaur fossile. But say...proof of aliens landing here and talking with the worlds great leaders, that would be impossible to explain. How could you tell somebody that without them telling you that you're full of it? Things like that, that are just truely out there. But I do fully understand your side of the 'discussion'. I see what you're saying.