- Joined
- Feb 5, 2008
- Messages
- 6,252
- Points
- 83
Exactly my point.If you can pull it off ,why upgrade and go broke for a few more frames per second?
What's the point of upgrading your equipement for hundreds of dollars when you can have the exact same performance on a machine costing HALF that amount of money?
So what if you can't use Morphological Antialiasing and 16x Anisotrophic filtering? Those are pretty much extra-stress settings for highest cutting edge PCs which only decrease performance without providing any noticeable, if any, visual gain. But some people just aren't happy if absolutely all possible and impossible settings aren't maxed out.
I always go for "Best buy" options. Best performance on limited budget. When I was buying my PC some 3 years back, I spend almost an entire week Googling through every possible benchmark results and prices to assemble the most powerful $450 machine I could.
With a Radeon 4670 and Athlon II 7750+BE, it ran pretty much everything.
Only Crysis 2 ever demanded a resolution decrease, and DX10 exclusive titles weren't shining.
Now with GTX260 upgrade, even those are all maxed out or almost maxed out.
So yeah we pretty much agree
I'm doing research about ongoing trends in gaming rigs for past few weeks, and will continue to do so until sometime later next month because aforementioned friend of mine is buying a secondary gaming PC and asked me to create a rig for him. And that's exactly what I'm going to do. Squeeze in $1000 OEM machine performance into $600 custom made hand-picked components rig.