jayrob
0
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2007
- Messages
- 9,862
- Points
- 113
Re: GB feeler laser barrels
Kenom, please put me down for 1...
Thanks,
Jay
Kenom, please put me down for 1...
Thanks,
Jay
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The barrels will look like a Sonar case on http://www.wickedlasers.com/lasers/SONAR_Blu_ray_Case-58-11.html
the one exception being there won't be any indents on the barrel. the barrel is totally smooth and finished smooth and shiny
Benm said:I might be interested in these as well, preference for CR123 powered and a good amount of room to mount my own driver in.
However:
The barrels will look like a Sonar case on http://www.wickedlasers.com/lasers/SONAR_Blu_ray_Case-58-11.html
the one exception being there won't be any indents on the barrel. the barrel is totally smooth and finished smooth and shiny
I would really recommend working some ridges into the barrel on the output end, increasing surface area and hence cooling ability. Cooler operation really improves laser performance, and it shouldn't be that hard to do when you are building from scratch anyways!
busterhax said:i think adding a notch inside of the unit that will stop the batteries would be quite a good idea also. the sonar case was a pita to get something in there that would stop the batteries but still hold up to the tension of the spring
However, since the head is constructed out of one piece of aluminum and there is a large amount of metal in the head by itself, I don't see heat being an issue for this.
Benm said:Heatsinking ability relies more on surface than it does on mass, though many people think otherwise. A solid block of aluninium has the exact same thermal resistance tpwards ambiant as a hollow cube of equal dimensions. Internal heat conductance is another thing, but only becomes limiting with a really thin shell.
However, lets just stick to real world performance. For the sony diodes, running at, for example, 25 versus 40 degrees results in a power loss of around 10% for a given current. It will probably also have an effect on diode life, though i have no hard data on that.
It's totally up to you if that's worth machining a larger surface area... i'm interested either way though.
danielbriggs said:@pyro - why are you multiplying by the specific heat capacity of water??? :-?
danielbriggs said:I.e. to have a threaded part may take an extra 5 mins per unit to make, x100 = an extra 8 hours min, which could raise the price by £20 (per hour) = £160...
a_pyro_is said:Unless my memory is faulty, Specific heat of water near room temp is about .998 cal/g-°C whereas Al is .215 cal/g-°C
a_pyro_is said:But i'd still like to see the outside of the head be round and a common size so that I could thread it if I wanted to without having to have someone turn it down first.
a_pyro_is said:It's been some time since I've taken any physics classes so someone please correct any mistakes.
a_pyro_is said:I agree with you, but only for longer runtimes. For a short duration the heatsink is just a thermal flywheel absorbing the thermal energy from the diode and radiating very little. Hence a large mass is a large flywheel.