IgorT
0
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2007
- Messages
- 4,177
- Points
- 0
Yep... I've got an 8X in a tiny Pocket Mini and it's fine.
The Pocket Mini is actually not that tiny, that i would be worried.. I was mostly worried about keychains, where the body is the only heatsink, or the heatsink is small...
I would not put a 12x in a keychain host, however if a duty cycle is observed, it can still be done, because in 1-2 min, it would not overheat...
The reason i'm thinking about heat and host size is that i don't like observing the duty cycle.. :evil:
A 12x and heat... Let's say we power a 12x for 650mW.. I'm gonna have to guess some numbers, but it'll come out close, besides it'll vary by 12x diode efficiency anyway, and it's the diodes efficiency that will impact the calculation the most.There are plenty of kits with a much more massive heatsink than a Pocket Mini. The 12 X can't be that much more heat.
So, assuming similar slope efficiency as a high efficiency 8x for a good 12x diode, it will take 410mA after the threshold current to reach 650mW... Let's say Ith = 40mA since it's a higher power diode.. It'll probably be a little less tho, between 35 and 39mA i'm guessing.
Anyway, 410 + 40mA = 450mA for 650mW. If the Vf stays in normal ranges, 0.45A x 5.6V = 2.52W of electrical power going from the driver into the diode...
Since 650mW comes out of the laser, 2.52W - 0.65W = 1.87W.. The diode will produce 1.87W of heat.
If it is powered by a ~90% efficiency driver, the driver will create some heat as well. 2.52W is coming OUT of the driver, if it's 90% efficient, this means 2.52W is 90% of the power going INTO the driver..
2.52W = 90/100 x Pin => Pin = 2.52W/90 x 100 = 2.8W - a 90% efficient driver needs 2.8W to feed 2.52W to the diode.
Since it's 90% efficient, 10% of 2.8W gets converted to heat, meaning the driver creates 0.28W of heat.
The 650mW 12x laser as a whole creates 1.87W + 0.28W = 2.15W of heat... (Well actually a little more if we consider that the Li-Ion warms up some from the high current draw..)
Umm... I might?It's not like were going to run them for 10 minutes at a time.
Actually, it's very likelly. I'd say it's almost certain.... :angel:
Actually Lava's existing FlexDrives were always a couple of percent more efficient than my driver, cos they work in a slightly different way. He uses a synchronous switching IC, which rectifies the output with MOSFETs, while my driver uses a Schottky diode to rectify the output, which introduces slightly higher losses, due to the higher voltage drop across the diode.Igor's got an efficient blu-ray driver that will not be a heat issue for the driver, and Dr. Lava is working on one as well...
The reason i prefer my own driver for 405nm diodess is not the efficiency (which is very high with both), but the fact that i don't have to worry about driver's current and voltage output limits when powering BluRays (and the little extra stability it offers due to the very simple circuit).
Switching drivers, when used correctly, are all very efficient. Especially in comparison to linear drivers, which often produce as much heat as the diode itself, and in some combinations almost twice as much!
In comparison a DC/DC converter driver from the example i used above, the 90% efficient driver creates only 11.1% as much heat as the diode, or 13% of the lasers total heat...
Last edited: