- Joined
- Jan 2, 2009
- Messages
- 11,800
- Points
- 0
Dont hold your breath. No word from Wicked for quite a while now. They have a habit of reneging on there promises.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Dont hold your breath. No word from Wicked for quite a while now. They have a habit of reneging on there promises.
Ok got it, I will definitely notify you once its ready.
Steve
Those have already read it on the vets section. I made the thread there to avoid spam. You'll get into the vets section as soon as you reach 1000 posts, no need to spam to get there.
oh, okay.I know Albert, it was just a joke.
You missed my main point. You will NEVER get the kind of "confident" knowledge you are requiring, from only two or even four diodes. This is the "false" sense of confidence I talked about. Diodes are too inconsistent for that to work.
The following is going to be a MAJOR over-simplification
To discover where they will run a certain diode, manufacturers/researchers run MANY diodes at the same current. They look for the point where 50% of the diodes fail after the desired lifetime. When they reach that point (50% fail) they record it. Since the diodes in the projector were running at ~650mW and the projector is "rated" for 10,000 hours, it is probable that at 650mW about half of the diodes will be dead at 10,000 hours of use.
Understanding the way diodes are rated and the sometimes exgtreme variability in them, how can seeing that two diodes ran at any length of time at any current will assure you that any other diode will run for that time at that current. What if yours were ones that would run longer than "rated"? What if they were ones that would run shorter than "rated"? What if you got one of each?
Even IgorT's 12X experiment exposes the problems inherent in this kind of "research." Before IgorT got a 12X to run at the desired current, TWO OF THEM FAILED AT LOWER CURRENTS! However, instead of accepting this limit, we and he kept trying. We finally got one that acted the way we wanted and all breathed a sigh of relief that we had finally gotten a diode that was not defective. People now jumped on the higher "safe" current as proven by IgorT's testing. This despite the "fact" that 2/3 of the diodes tested failed well below the succesful one.
So how many diodes do we need to kill? At what current should we run them? How many hours of life at a given current will be acceptable? What good is "killing them" at all? We will know at what current those particular diodes failed after a given number of hours. However, what will that tell me about MY diode?
Peace,
dave