3.56W 445 Laser on ebay

[awillis2589]

Well I'm subscribed to your channel so I'll keep an eye out for it. Also would there be a price drop if we just bought a 3W laser without the battery's or charger or glasses as I already own all of these and don't need any extras?

 

[ricktrent4]

some not muck I buy them 500 at a time so I get them cheap

 

[ZRaffleticket]

Can you also compare the stock lens of the 9mm diode? (assuming the diodes come with them)

 

[HitShane]

Well I'm subscribed to your channel so I'll keep an eye out for it. Also would there be a price drop if we just bought a 3W laser without the battery's or charger or glasses as I already own all of these and don't need any extras?

Ya I wouldn't want any of those items either. I have my own :beer:

I really wish each thread was a chat room... Same interface for the threads, but a chatroom that keeps history... Ideas would be over in minutes and not days...

 

[ricktrent4]

if you do not need batteries or charger or glass I can take off $10 the video is up loading now show around 400mw on my 3.5w wow :drool:

this is the video let me know what you think
T1 verses g1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U7EJWl0YQNw

 

[DTR]

I didn't see any difference between the g1 and g2 at all, or if there is one, it's not really noticeable. Afaik it's the same exact lens, just mounted different.

@DTR - How can a lens amplify the output :thinking:

Yea the G-1 and G-2 have on average the same pass with slight variations from lens to lens. They are just two lenses that pretty much do the same thing.


That is what I mean. It can't.

 

[awillis2589]

T1 9mm 445nm Laser Lens M9P0 5 Metal Frame 30 Increase Over Aixiz Three | eBay

This one right. I'm going to have to give this a try.

 

[ZRaffleticket]

Hey, for future reference you can post videos directly like this

[media=youtube]U7EJWl0YQNw[/media]

That's pretty impressive how the lenses you have outperform the G's. I wonder how well they'll work on 405's too

 

[ricktrent4]

if you have the 9mm yes it will work on the 5.6mm too
did you see the video?

 

[DTR]

Here found the thread I was looking for. The G-1 measured a 96.5% transmission rate when they were originally tested with 405nm and should be the same with 445 since they are coated 400-600nm. Not to far you can go from there if his figures are acurate. The three elements was a 73% transmission.
http://laserpointerforums.com/f52/jayrob-vs-larryfdfw-ar-lens-vs-aixiz-standards-37895.html

 

[awillis2589]

Seen the video and am about to buy one for testing it against a Casio 9mm lens and G2 and if it out performs them which it looks like it will, then I'll keep it. I'll also do a video with lpm test. Sound good?

Order placed.

 

[ricktrent4]

were do I find the html cod tab?

 

[ZRaffleticket]

Well if you're trying to put the youtube video in, avoid the html code tab, but otherwise it's the <> symbol in the editor.
if you're just putting the video in, put the ID in the youtube tags

 

[awillis2589]

Is two things to the left of the YouTube link thing. It looks like this <>

 

[gecko991]

One or more of us need to take one for testing. Go for it awillis2589.

 

[awillis2589]

I plan on it. If it does work better then a g2 then I'm going to have a 3W m140.