Welcome to Laser Pointer Forums - discuss green laser pointers, blue laser pointers, and all types of lasers

LPF Donation via Stripe | LPF Donation - Other Methods

Links below open in new window

ArcticMyst Security by Avery

2.1W "Evil Shadow" 650nm C-Mount Diode build Handheld

Joined
Aug 14, 2013
Messages
2,655
Points
63
Sorry, I thought this was another one of
those fapril ool 'jokes'. I was not aware
the SXD could go up to 7 amps. Everyone
else was saying 5 MAX. And thanks for the
picture, too. It helps clear up a little
idea I was having amongst myselves. :D
 





jayrob

0
Joined
Sep 21, 2007
Messages
9,862
Points
113
Thanks you two for the info. Jayrob why did you use those 1n5404s?

I followed the instructions from the driver manufacture with no questions asked. (Angelos)

For this specific set up (C-mount red), he wanted an extra layer of safety is what I figure...

About the 7 Amps, I did not test. Again, this was told me from Angelos. That it can do that.

Obviously the diode voltage vs supply voltage, etc... all come into play with what it can do, but he said that it can get to 7 Amps. 5 easily...
 

rhd

0
Joined
Dec 7, 2010
Messages
8,475
Points
0
Thanks you two for the info. Jayrob why did you use those 1n5404s?

I followed the instructions from the driver manufacture with no questions asked. (Angelos)

For this specific set up (C-mount red), he wanted an extra layer of safety is what I figure...

There are probably two reasons:

1) Most adjustable drivers use some form of voltage drop scaling, and typically that involves a second IC in the output current path. That second IC is often powered directly from the output current path, which means that if the IC has a minimum operating voltage of, say, 3V, it will struggle when used with loads (laser diodes) that drop less than 3V (an example being IR and RED diodes). Adding 1N5404 diodes is a way to add a little more voltage drop to the driver's output, so that the secondary current scaling IC has enough voltage to power up.

2) The cleanliness of a switching driver's output is impacted by the magnitude of the difference between voltage in and voltage out. A buck driver using lithium ions to drive a 445nm diode with a Vf of 5V will produce a cleaner output than the exact same driver setup driving a 650nm diode with a Vf of 3V, at the exact same current, all else being equal. Even though it doesn't seem like a big difference, it can be. Bucking from 6V to 3V involves 3x the differential of bucking from 6V to 5V. That means more ripple. Bringing up the output voltage may reduce the ripple, which is important on these sensitive diodes.
 
Joined
May 1, 2011
Messages
949
Points
0
Hey I learned a few new things :)
I actually got a few of those diodes I bought on ebay once so I'm glad I will have a use for them.
 

rhd

0
Joined
Dec 7, 2010
Messages
8,475
Points
0
Hey I learned a few new things :)
I actually got a few of those diodes I bought on ebay once so I'm glad I will have a use for them.

Do you want to sell one? I bought one from cdbeam that turned up doa, so I'm still looking for one.
 
Joined
May 1, 2011
Messages
949
Points
0
??

You have to be talking about a different diode than what is shown in this thread right?

Didn't he mean the 1n5404 diodes?

lol I guess he meant the C-mount :eek::eek: my bad. Yeah would be awesome if they were cheap :crackup:
Sorry RHD I can't part with mine.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 14, 2013
Messages
2,655
Points
63
I haven't decided what I am going to do
with my C-mount. I ran into so many
problems with my build.

Now that there is a 638nm C-mount with FAC
and everything, I'm not sure why everyone
seems to want the old 660nm diodes all of a
sudden.
 

jayrob

0
Joined
Sep 21, 2007
Messages
9,862
Points
113
I haven't decided what I am going to do
with my C-mount. I ran into so many
problems with my build.

Now that there is a 638nm C-mount with FAC
and everything, I'm not sure why everyone
seems to want the old 660nm diodes all of a
sudden.

Link please... :)
 
Joined
May 1, 2011
Messages
949
Points
0
I haven't decided what I am going to do
with my C-mount. I ran into so many
problems with my build.

Now that there is a 638nm C-mount with FAC
and everything, I'm not sure why everyone
seems to want the old 660nm diodes all of a
sudden.

Really a 638 cmount?? Like Jayrob said Link Please! :D
 
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
2,834
Points
63
Is it the same diode you started a feeler for, then didn't tell anyone the manufacturer? Cause if so, I don't really think you can refer to them as "oh you know, those diodes everyone knows about." Not trying to be rude, but if you are going to keep talking about them, stop pulling our leg and throw us a bone [link] :)
 
Joined
Aug 14, 2013
Messages
2,655
Points
63
Here are some pictures from the first test.
I haven't set up a sales thread or anything
just yet. If you want to talk about it or see
more pictures or anything, just send me a PM. :beer:
 

rhd

0
Joined
Dec 7, 2010
Messages
8,475
Points
0
Is it the same diode you started a feeler for, then didn't tell anyone the manufacturer? Cause if so, I don't really think you can refer to them as "oh you know, those diodes everyone knows about." Not trying to be rude, but if you are going to keep talking about them, stop pulling our leg and throw us a bone [link] :)

Ya, I second that. That was really f'ing annoying.
 
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
2,834
Points
63
And like I said, I'm not trying to be rude; but in a hobbyist community that's as small as it is, there really is zero point to just dangling something as awesome as 4 watts of 635 in front of people. Not only for us, but the projector guys at PL would salivate over those.
 




Top