oikos
0
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2010
- Messages
- 330
- Points
- 0
is there a science/physic limitation behind why the mass production jump from 635nm to 532nm and then to 405nm while the 473nm, 593nm, 589nm remain uncommon and expensive? :tired: thanx
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
660nm lasers were mass produced for dvd burners. Now 405nm lasers are being produced because of bluray burners. I think greens are cheaper just cause they've been around for awhile, so the companies figured out the cheapest way to make them. All those expensive colors you mentioned are all relativly new DPSS lasers that aren't in demand, and require a lot of time to build.
Because the 635nm (red) and 405nm (near UV) are not DPSS (diode pumped solid state), they are just like an LED with a driver and focusing lens, so they're dirt cheap.is there a science/physic limitation behind why the mass production jump from 635nm to 532nm and then to 405nm while the 473nm, 593nm, 589nm remain uncommon and expensive? :tired: thanx
It's purely to do with the crystals involved. They are much rarer than the crystals used in DPSS greens, so they cost a lot more.
However, blue isn't as expensive as you may think. You can buy a 1W 445nm diode for around $2000US, however, the cost of a 1W 473nm blue lab module will easily run over $10,000US!
...the 635nm (red) and 405nm... are just like an LED with a driver and focusing lens, so they're dirt cheap.