Welcome to Laser Pointer Forums - discuss green laser pointers, blue laser pointers, and all types of lasers

Buy Site Supporter Role (remove some ads) | LPF Donations

Links below open in new window

FrozenGate by Avery

Who wants a variable power laser?

Who wants a variable power laser?

  • Yes - I've always wanted one

    Votes: 23 47.9%

  • Yes - I want one

    Votes: 11 22.9%

  • Yes/Later - I want one but aren't looking ATM

    Votes: 13 27.1%

  • Err - Why would you limit your power!?

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • No - I have other more pressing needs

    Votes: 1 2.1%
  • Total voters
    48
17 people want one now, another 7 want one later...

Surely there's enough money here to make a builder's investment worthwhile.

Anybody got an idea how we move forward? Are there any trusted well respected builders out there willing to bring something exciting to the market? I personally would want a non-PWM based driver.
 





clansley said:
17 people want one now, another 7 want one later...

Surely there's enough money here to make a builder's investment worthwhile.

Anybody got an idea how we move forward? Are there any trusted well respected builders out there willing to bring something exciting to the market? I personally would want a non-PWM based driver.
Click to expand...

Why not PWM? You are saying its not as safe- just because its lower power? If anyone stares into a laser /period/, if if its because they "think its lower power" (which it would be) they are stupid. Still seems like the best way to go, but then again I am no electrical expert- if one said expert would chime in that'd be great :)
 
crazyspaz said:
Why not PWM? You are saying its not as safe- just because its lower power? If anyone stares into a laser /period/, if if its because they "think its lower power" (which it would be) they are stupid. Still seems like the best way to go, but then again I am no electrical expert- if one said expert would chime in that'd be great :)
Click to expand...

AFAIK, An extreme example: I would have to be insane to use a 3W laser indoors, if such a laser was dimmable to 100mW then it seems less insane, but if it was dimmed using PWM then it is actually at 100% power but for short periods, so as dangerous as 3W to our eyes even if it appears like 100mW.

But I agree I would rather have an expert say this rather than me repeating things I've seen.
 
Last edited:
I use all my lasers indoors and RARELY outside and I've lots of high powered units;) I can't argue that I may be insane though:banghead:
 
I agree that it can't be PWM based due to safety concerns.

I often use my 462nm with a single batt for 30-80mW (just above threshold) and I consider it safe enough to shine around the house, while I wouldn't do that with 1.5W.

TBH if I wanted to do this the PWM way I'd just use a small Arduino. Could probably pull it off in an afternoon even with my little knowledge of analog electronics.
 
Atomicrox said:
I suppose it would require a buck driver with two pots - one on board for setting the maximum current and solder pads for an external pot to vary the current between 0-100%.

Would also require a custom or modified host with a hole for the pot.
Click to expand...

I would very much like this, but I would also need a locking mechanism so the pot couldn't be turned to full if I put the laser in my coat pocket. Perhaps full digital driver with Arduino controlling sets of resistors from a button on the side of the host which doesn't send input if a safety dongle is removed
 
Actually what I had in mind was a tailcap switch to turn on and off and the pot to change power. That way it wouldn't turn on by itself.

Edit: if someone knows how to make a proper buck driver (analog) using PWM input for an Arduino I'd be willing to do the programming/digital portion.
 
Last edited:
Why not use the pot found on most existing drivers? Just add it in series with the existing one, to set the maximum current, and use the other for variable power. For some reason everyone thinks an Arduino is needed for everything... KISS
 
I was wondering about the control of such a variable power laser.

Initially an analog knob or slider comes to mind as it easily allows the power to be changed up or down and by small or large amounts.

What about a digital interface, with one button you would have to cycle around the powers. With two you could go up or down. But what about the step size? Linear step sizes doesn't work as they need to be smaller at lower powers and larger at higher powers.

If we had a variable power laser that ranged from 50mW to 1W what steps would make sense? How about doubling the power at each step?

50mW
100mW
200mW
400mW
800mW
1000mW [1600 capped to 1W]

or maybe linear works with 100mW increases - although it would be a lot of button presses:
50mW
150mW
250mW
350mW
450mW
550mW
650mW
750mW
850mW
950mW
1000mW

I imagine such a laser wouldn't acutally be controlling the power directly and in stead controlling the current which in turn would control the power (but it is unlikely to be linear like I've made it out to be above).
 
Last edited:
I think a logarithmic scale makes more sense than linear. Our visual response isn't linear after all.
 
Pssst... our dreams will soon be fulfilled; a major player is developing our dream ;)
 
We're up to 34 saying they want one and only 1 doesn't - this is clearly a feature people want!

My previous post was too optimistic - things are looking colder now :( [but at least not completely dead yet]

I've decided I only want to invest in variable power lasers so I can't spend a penny until one exists - except for 589nm which is only available in low powers! So Crazily I may end up with a 589nm before having quality lasers of the common wavelengths!
 
Both but things have gone quiet so that might not happen, we may need to look for another source. :(
There seems to be good money to be made here if somebody added this feature.
 
It could happen, if a member here can put the time in to prototype and bankroll. Good luck to your dream.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.





Back
Top