Jhop
0
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2016
- Messages
- 316
- Points
- 0
Oooooch , that's cold
Especially if it's the day old M&C that's been in the fridg. all night
mmm reheated kraft mac n cheese is so good. Im gonna have to go buy some now...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oooooch , that's cold
Especially if it's the day old M&C that's been in the fridg. all night
mmm reheated kraft mac n cheese is so good. Im gonna have to go buy some now...
Excellent, Christmas is coming to your house early also. Enjoy
Which 473 did you get?
Or to get more temp control devices. However the easiest solutions are the best. I was considering also neoprene sleves maybe with some pockets inside for cooling bags (I know there exist heating bags, but not sure if something like this is for cooling - maybe the capsules used in portable fridges) and silicagel to absorb humidity? Many ideas, little time to find out the best working solution.
Bob, thanks. I might do some "review" but as not having LPM and other stuff to meet common standards here, this would be more appropriate to call it something like: "Enjoyment of 473 nm JL PL-E Pro 100 mW". Also I wish you to enjoy your lasers and let us know your opinions/reviews... Especially the dazzler. I'm interested how you will test its effects.
Maybe to compare it with flashlight, camera flash or car headlight? I wouldn't try it on eyes for sure. Maybe you can LPM and get energy density for different distances and for different focus settings and calculate flashblindess effects? Compared to camera flash for example it would get some reference how you would feel if you got a hit. There surely will be some studies on internet where methods of measurments are described.
Well, you have more experience than I have. I have not done any experiment like this, just thinking how I would do it without using my eyes exposed to laser hit. At least I would measure MPE distance for a given focus settings before for sure. Just to make the test safe. Also it might be better to try it on some cheaper camera and evaluate it by comparsion of exposure of pic from safe light source (which you can try on yourself) and dazzler. You have time to consider options before your package appears on your doorstep.
Edit: I tried to google it snd this is first link I got: https://kuscholarworks.ku.edu/bitstream/1808/10629/1/Richardson_ku_0099M_12493_DATA_1.pdf
I just went through contents briefly and it might be useful for you. Just saying that this information lays somewhere on internet.
You are welcome. It is quite interesting reading what I saw so far and some literature is there as well. I'll go through it as well later. I have to go to bed now. Lot of work tomorrow. Good luck with it.