**** the government - wake up people!?

[rocketparrotlet]

This thread is great.

And those "nanothermite" (what the hell is nanothermite?! I call BS...) and so called thermite cuts are just shear fracturing from immense pressure and skewed weight distribution.

Molten iron/steel? Umm...no. As said before, just aluminum. They look the same when molten.

High explosives would probably not even start a fire like jet fuel would. They would be completely done in a fraction of a second.

The temperatures you provided, Wes, are very wrong. Fires are much hotter than that. You say molten steel at 1300 degrees Fahrenheit, well, guess what. A freaking candle burns hotter than that. Definitely not hot enough to melt steel!

-Mark

 

[wesdaman14]

Yeah so what do you guys think about this video and what there saying ?

 

[wesdaman14]

Why is there a small explosion ?

 

[wesdaman14]

 

[wesdaman14]

I want just 1 person to read this webpage and tell me that its not correct in what it says

Demolition of the World Trade Center

 

[Meatball]

Its not correct. I've also seen a youtube video claiming that the Gov used UAVs guided by a laser... haha

ironic.. is it not?

 

[wesdaman14]

Its not correct. I've also seen a youtube video claiming that the Gov used UAVs guided by a laser... haha

ironic.. is it not?

You are correct. it could of not of been a plane because everyone would of heard it and seen it flying so low to the ground but no one heard anything till the last second.

 

[pullbangdead]

I want just 1 person to read this webpage and tell me that its not correct in what it says

Demolition of the World Trade Center

Ok, read it, and it's not correct in what it says.

Now, since I read that, you read this: http://www.civil.northwestern.edu/people/bazant/PDFs/Papers/00%20WTC%20Collapse%20-%20What%20Did%20&%20Did%20Not%20Cause%20It.pdf

Really, read what an actual expert says, and show me where he's wrong. Show me a mistake in his calculations that prove it can't have been demolition, and had to be the combination of a giant impact of an airplane and the ensuing fire.

 

[pullbangdead]

You are correct. it could of not of been a plane because everyone would of heard it and seen it flying so low to the ground but no one heard anything till the last second.

Whhhaaaaaaaaa?

Of course it was a plane, not a UAV. Look at the videos, look at the wreckage, look at the accounts. Both were CLEARLY airline passenger jets. Only the most asinine conspiracy types believe in this, so you must be the most asinine of conspiracy types.

 

[wesdaman14]

Ok, read it, and it's not correct in what it says.

Now, since I read that, you read this: http://www.civil.northwestern.edu/people/bazant/PDFs/Papers/00%20WTC%20Collapse%20-%20What%20Did%20&%20Did%20Not%20Cause%20It.pdf

Really, read what an actual expert says, and show me where he's wrong. Show me a mistake in his calculations that prove it can't have been demolition, and had to be the combination of a giant impact of an airplane and the ensuing fire.

You still fucking thing it was a plane ? How does the wings just slice through steel like a knife through butter ? A solid does not go into a solid the last time i remember. The wings would of collided and Bent outward's, not slice through the steel .

 

[elitesniper]

You still fucking thing it was a plane ? How does the wings just slice through steel like a knife through butter ? A solid does not go into a solid the last time i remember. The wings would of collided and Bent outward's, not slice through the steel .

speed of the plane...mass of the plane...

 

[wesdaman14]

speed of the plane...mass of the plane...

Aluminum does not go through steel how dumb are u people !
the faster the " plane " went, Means the faster it would of bended into a jumble of plane parts.

 

[pullbangdead]

You still fucking thing it was a plane ? How does the wings just slice through steel like a knife through butter ? A solid does not go into a solid the last time i remember. The wings would of collided and Bent outward's, not slice through the steel .

Physics wes, physics. Lead is softer than both steel and aluminum, yet lead bullets will go right through both of them. Do you even think about these things before you post them?

Ever seen the aftermath of a tornado, where the high windspeeds will lodge blades of grass in telephone poles? It's very easy, actually. Make anything go fast, and it'll go through other things.

Here's an example: records are EXTREMELY fragile, yet this one was successfully lodged in a telephone pole due to its high speeds.

 

[pullbangdead]

Aluminum does not go through steel how dumb are u people !
the faster the " plane " went, Means the faster it would of bended into a jumble of plane parts.

Again wes, think! Bullets vs. steel plates! Lead bullets, copper-jacketed bullets, all softer than steel, yet they go through! Yeah, they get severely damaged, but they go through, just like the plane.

Oh, and the building isn't solid steel, a whole lot of the outer wall is made of glass.

Oh, and the plane WAS just "bended [sic] into a jumble of plane parts", it wasn't sitting there on the other side wholly intact, it was very much destroyed, as was the building.

 

[wesdaman14]

Again wes, think! Bullets vs. steel plates! Lead bullets, copper-jacketed bullets, all softer than steel, yet they go through! Yeah, they get severely damaged, but they go through, just like the plane.

Oh, and the building isn't solid steel, a whole lot of the outer wall is made of glass.

The "plane " Would of been huge compared to the building.
its not like a bullet thats super small and designed to go into objects, the plane is designed to be the most air efferent, not efferent at going into objects. The last time i was on on a Airliner and i looked at the wings, i saw a sticker on the wing that said " No step here "
meaning that the people who built it would of broke the wing if they stepped on it. But yet it will go through steel and stay intact with out bending or anything.
it just dont add up.

 

[pullbangdead]

The "plane " Would of been huge compared to the building.
its not like a bullet thats super small and designed to go into objects, the plane is designed to be the most air efferent, not efferent at going into objects. The last time i was on on a Airliner and i looked at the wings, i saw a sticker on the wing that said " No step here "
meaning that the people who built it would of broke the wing if they stepped on it. But yet it will go through steel and stay intact with out bending or anything.
it just dont add up.

Read the edit, the plane was SHREDDED. It wasn't sitting there intact, of course not. It went through the wall, destroying the plane AND the wall. But it certainly wasn't going to just pancake on the side of the building. It smashed through, smashing the wall and the plane.