Scumbag police in usa kill dog

[NKO29]

see this is what 1 bad incident does- gives police a bad rep. without police being present we would be f*cked!
not to mention people should be scared of the police so they dont f*ck with the law!

 

[Leodahsan]

This just had so much attention because of the spasms. I'm on the other side of the world and saw it. But do anyone of you knew that a dog killed his owner here in BR, a 35yr old pharmacist? No?

Because no one killed the dog, so no spasms = no violent death = nothing on the news.

People seem to value more a dog than a human.

 

[Danteslayer]

see this is what 1 bad incident does- gives police a bad rep. without police being present we would be f*cked!
not to mention people should be scared of the police so they dont f*ck with the law!

No citizens of any nation should be scared of there police.
If everyone started being scared of police people would have no rights

 

[NKO29]

well thats another thing... If that dog attacked the police officers then it would have most likely attacked an innocent person or even a child! so much fuss over something so simple! even if they tazed it or pepper sprayed it animal rights fags would have flamed them anyways...

 

[NKO29]

in terms of crime rates, just look at all asian countries where you loose a hand for stealing and go away for a long time for drug offences. people dont dare to steal or drug deal there.

 

[Leodahsan]

He attacked the officer to defend his owner. Its body language, he saw his owner "dominated" and tried to help.

 

[Eudaimonium]

I think the owner is to blame here - why on Earth would you record police? Armed with machine guns?

What are you going to do with the recording anyway? Why is it even important?

If he just went "Meh, it's a bunch of police cars, some shit is happening" and proceeded about his own life, all of this could've been avoided.

BUT, now that he did, why were the police attempting to arrest the man? Having a camera/phone pointed at you can be annoying sometimes but is it a felony?

 

[Razako]

well thats another thing... If that dog attacked the police officers then it would have most likely attacked an innocent person or even a child! so much fuss over something so simple! even if they tazed it or pepper sprayed it animal rights fags would have flamed them anyways...

The dog was doing what dogs are SUPPOSED TO DO. It defended its owner from people who were attacking(arresting) the owner.

in terms of crime rates, just look at all asian countries where you loose a hand for stealing and go away for a long time for drug offences. people dont dare to steal or drug deal there.

So you want us all to be like Asian/middle eastern police state countries where they sentence you to 20 years hard labor for having a few poppy seeds in your travel bag?

 

[Razako]

I think the owner is to blame here - why on Earth would you record police? Armed with machine guns?

What are you going to do with the recording anyway? Why is it even important?

If he just went "Meh, it's a bunch of police cars, some shit is happening" and proceeded about his own life, all of this could've been avoided.

BUT, now that he did, why were the police attempting to arrest the man? Having a camera/phone pointed at you can be annoying sometimes but is it a felony?

Here in the US it can be illegal to record police doing their job. I find it stupid as hell myself. If the cops aren't doing anything wrong they have nothing to fear.

 

[Dr_Evil]

I think the owner is to blame here - why on Earth would you record police? Armed with machine guns?

What are you going to do with the recording anyway? Why is it even important?

If he just went "Meh, it's a bunch of police cars, some shit is happening" and proceeded about his own life, all of this could've been avoided.

BUT, now that he did, why were the police attempting to arrest the man? Having a camera/phone pointed at you can be annoying sometimes but is it a felony?

It doesn't appear that anything happened to the guys recording the guy with the dog though. There should be no reason you can't record cops doing their job. The guy did nothing wrong that we can tell unless it is illegal to record them. It looks like he might have been saying something to the cops.

The dog just might have been trying to stay with the owner. It didn't seem like it would've been one to harm anybody at first. I honestly think the cop overreacted or was too trigger happy. I would be happy to see the PD/city pay the owner some big money.

 

[Eudaimonium]

You can pay him all the money. It won't bring the dead back to life.

But, to me it DID look like the dog is about to attack the officers - it tried to catch the shooter by his arm.

Not sure about laws over there, but here, there are regulations which say that, if your dog is large enough or of specific agressive breeds, if he's out of your personal property (back yard, house, apartment), the dog MUST be on a leash at all times and must have that thing over it's mouth to prevent it from biting anybody.

Now there's another thing. Even if the dog didn't come out on his own to attack the police, they would've need to deal with him eventually, as they are arresting the man. Surely, you can't arrest somebody and leave their pets right there as they were out in the street?

 

[Dr_Evil]

You can pay him all the money. It won't bring the dead back to life.

But, to me it DID look like the dog is about to attack the officers - it tried to catch the shooter by his arm.

Not sure about laws over there, but here, there are regulations which say that, if your dog is large enough or of specific agressive breeds, if he's out of your personal property (back yard, house, apartment), the dog MUST be on a leash at all times and must have that thing over it's mouth to prevent it from biting anybody.

Now there's another thing. Even if the dog didn't come out on his own to attack the police, they would've need to deal with him eventually, as they are arresting the man. Surely, you can't arrest somebody and leave their pets right there as they were out in the street?

That ticks me off when specific breeds are targeted. The owner plays a large part in how the dog behaves. They is no way in hell I'd put a muzzle on my dog just to take it out in public because the law says so. I bet you $1,000 that dog never would have been a problem if the cops just payed attention to the bigger task going on. What if one of the cops decided to rob the owners house and the dog attacted?

There was a chance teh guy never would have been taken to jail. They may have talked to him and had him delete the video. Then he might have been released. If not he should have been able to make a call to have the dog and car picked up by a family member or friend.

 

[TheDukeAnumber1]

It will help keep obnoxious people from taking out their camera every time an officer shows up. I can even us this video as an example, lots of dumb people see an out of context slip and get all angry at the officers. It's ridiculous that some of you side with the dog and call the officer a pussy. That dog was very threatening and looked like it could have mauled someone, sadly it needed to be shot, and three shots isn't excessive, it's controlled and responsible.

 

[Razako]

To be fair the guy with the dog WAS being a total dickhead. He pulls up to the scene with loud music playing from his car and then refused to turn it down multiple times when the cops were telling him to because they couldn't hear each other over the music. Then when the cops finally go to arrest him he puts the dog in the car with the window wide open.

The cops handled the situation poorly in my mind, but this didn't need to happen if the dogs owner was a little smarter.

 

[grainde]

It will help keep obnoxious people from taking out their camera every time an officer shows up. I can even us this video as an example, lots of dumb people see an out of context slip and get all angry at the officers. It's ridiculous that some of you side with the dog and call the officer a pussy. That dog was very threatening and looked like it could have mauled someone, sadly it needed to be shot, and three shots isn't excessive, it's controlled and responsible.

Wow what a post! Sorry, but in a world where there is practically no accountability for those in power, the citizens should stand up for their rights. As far as Im aware, with all the draconian laws that are regularly passed, none yet prohibits a citizen from filming police on the street. If they object to being filmed they probably shouldn't be doing what they are doing. The police are public servants there to protect and serve not intimidate and abuse their powers because they can!

@ Dukeanumber - So your "out of context slip" is shooting the dog? OR is that "controlled and responsible"...Make up your mind :tsk:

Also your subjective statement "That dog was very threatening and looked like it could have mauled someone" is just that SUBJECTIVE. Do you arrest all dubious looking characters or odd balls just because they might cause trouble - Guess its a case of charged and booked rather than guilty until proven innocent. :tsk:

 

[Leodahsan]

That ticks me off when specific breeds are targeted.

Have you heard about other breeds qualities like "playful" or "smart" breeds? There are aggressive breeds, and no one can deny that.

"Dog aggression is a common dog behavior, and can be seen in all breeds of dogs, although some dog breeds have a predisposition to display such aggression."

If it were a poodle, do you think they would shoot? No.
If it were a poodle, do you think it would try to defend his owner and attack "3 enemies" (as the dog saw the 3 police officers)?

Conclusion: A man filming some police action, a rottweiler willing to defend him, and nervous police officers. Mix the three and see what you get