lazeerer
0
- Joined
- May 25, 2010
- Messages
- 3,655
- Points
- 0
If they will get desoldered during removal of the diode from the array base, then I think it would already have desoldered already during manufacture?
Is what your saying when the manufacture bonded the diodes to the array base heat spreader that it would have desoldered the die then if it was indium for the die.?
Is that what your saying.?
If so yes, exactly my though and why i mentioned that todays dies are really no longer bonded with just pure indium.
Usually now adays what they use Indium for is to bond diode or diode sub mounts to larger heatsink blocks heat spreaders or TEC's etc.
Like these Examples of some of the diodes ive opened:
especially for diodes that dont have something that compresses or clamps down on them, indium would be the best and only way to bond them to the array heat spreader. Thermal adhesive IMO just wont cut it.
Also as a side note guys. These Nichia block mounts i was doing research on Dilas laser a long time ago "un related to these Nichia blocks" when Dilas first came out with the 40W 638nm and 40W 450nm blue lasers and found a write up with this image in it. I cant remember where the write up is but i saved the picture:
10W for each array. So 4x = 40W out the 400um Fiber.
Similar in design i would think I had another image that showed this array at another angle but i cant find it. But i remember the diodes where mounted similar to the OP's.
I actually almost bought a used one of these above and a used one of the 40W 638nm module awhile ago but the case condition on one of them was terrible and they wanted too much for both of them so i passed on it since they dint want to split them up.
Pretty cool though. How is the beam quality on these diodes. Are they the same as the 3.5W NDB7K75?