Anybody recall seeing a post about power output before and after "beam correction" prior to all the deletes?
I was shining it in the sky last night (beautiful dark blue wad reaching to the heavens), but I noticed that there was a good bit of blue light illuminating a structure next to me. It was more pattern like, would move in a consistent pattern as I rotated the body. I thought it might be light refracting off the front lens so I took it off and it still illuminated the structure. Currently the beam is noticeably bar shaped, not terrible, but enough that you can tell the beam is elongated from holes burnt in a cd case at three inches.
I will probably try to adjust the lens as shown in the deleted "beam correction" thread to see if I can get it tighter. Just curious if getting it down to a square beam will reduce overall output or just concentrate it into the square.
Come to think of it, I will remove the black heat sink from lens first, I bet the beam will be very wide once it’s not forced to shot thru the small hole.
I was shining it in the sky last night (beautiful dark blue wad reaching to the heavens), but I noticed that there was a good bit of blue light illuminating a structure next to me. It was more pattern like, would move in a consistent pattern as I rotated the body. I thought it might be light refracting off the front lens so I took it off and it still illuminated the structure. Currently the beam is noticeably bar shaped, not terrible, but enough that you can tell the beam is elongated from holes burnt in a cd case at three inches.
I will probably try to adjust the lens as shown in the deleted "beam correction" thread to see if I can get it tighter. Just curious if getting it down to a square beam will reduce overall output or just concentrate it into the square.
Come to think of it, I will remove the black heat sink from lens first, I bet the beam will be very wide once it’s not forced to shot thru the small hole.