ZapU... what purpose did that post serve? You're not going to be able to convince qumefox to change his mind on the looks.
Instead, why not stop ignoring the second (more interesting) half of his post and my post that elaborates on those same ideas. That can actually yield an interesting discourse.
-Trevor
First, let me say, I respect your work with the software for Kenometers, NOHD charts and laser labels. You obviously are seriously into this hobby.
As for qumefox, I'm still thinking of your earlier claim to represent most of the forum and also your inane claim about WL not sending out review units. You're entitled to your preferences. But I want to point out your arguments are not necessarily the universal view. Many members here may not know all the facts regarding the Arctic.
Trevor, our last posts came out simultaneously. So I didn't see your last response before I posted.
I think my Arctics are as dangerous as a gun, and I treat them as such, as should everyone.
At least the WL has gone to great extent to make the G2 safe. Electronic code, training lens, safety pin. That should make most people aware of the danger.
But I also agree with the premise that if lasers are not tools, then they are for entertainment, i.e. "toy". Particularly ANY handheld laser.
As Speaker Rob pointed out, we are getting into semantics .
And as to Wicked marketing, their screw ups are well documented, maybe we should start another thread to discuss this. I think we have gotten off topic here.
