FS: Optotronics RPL-350 Green laser

[bryce007]

I just hope that I am online with some available cash when yobresal finishes his comparative review :san:

Peace,
dave

I've requested a PM, but not sure if he got my request. BTW your rep just keeps growing and growing, well deserved though.

 

[f22warzone]

I didn't ask if he had an LPM... I asked for information that even
WL sends with each Laser..

I'm sorry if you think asking questions before I buy a laser is pushy...
I've bought 200mW lasers before only to find out they have problems
to maintain 100mW...

If the buyer knew the information on the written diocuments.. he only
needed to supply/post them.
Who the he!! is Jack... your brother.????
Maybe you should talk to Jean-Guy... to get your facts straight...
Oh I just saw you flexed your muscle on my reps... for what... asking info
before I buy a pig in a poke...:tsk:

Jerry

Just wondering if you're blind or not as the information is clearly written on those white documents along with jack, the owner of Optotronics Laser Products, signature on the bottom.

And what facts am I missing?

Guess I just miss understood and that you're blind and missed the documents that state the avg power so I am sorry for interrupting that that you wanted him o go out and buy an LPM in order to sell his laser

 

[yobresal]

Hey fellas. This arguement is kind of silly. Had the laser been a month old I would say that "Yes" we can go by the documents provided by Jack at optotronics but seeing as how it is a year old that document is no longer relevent. Take the case of the infamous 70mW 473nm RPL I purchased second hand. Though the paperwork clearly stated it was 70mW, the laser was only actually putting out around 30mW! I think Laserbee was interested in current measurements and with good reason. Hopefully this laser will perform up to the advertised spec. I will find out tommorow.

 

[bryce007]

Hey fellas. This arguement is kind of silly. Had the laser been a month old I would say that "Yes" we can go by the documents provided by Jack at optotronics but seeing as how it is a year old that document is no longer relevent. Take the case of the infamous 70mW 473nm RPL I purchased second hand. Though the paperwork clearly stated it was 70mW, the laser was only actually putting out around 30mW! I think Laserbee was interested in current measurements and with good reason. Hopefully this laser will perform up to the advertised spec. I will find out tommorow.

Same infamous laser now only putting out 17mW

 

[rhildinger]

Hey, why are people fighting in my forsale thread? Can't we all just get along? ;-)

Anyhoo, Yobresal should be receiving the laser tomorrow and will be able to verify that the laser he got is exactly as I received it from Jack at Optotronics.

Please let me know when you get it Yobresal, so I'll know it arrived safely.

-Robert

 

[yobresal]

Awesome Robert. I am totally stoked about this laser getting here tomorrow.

 

[yobresal]

This thing rocks! Better than described with goodies too. Thanks a bunch!

 

[lasersbee]

Just wondering if you're blind or not as the information is clearly written on those white documents along with jack, the owner of Optotronics Laser Products, signature on the bottom.

And what facts am I missing?

Guess I just miss understood and that you're blind and missed the documents that state the avg power so I am sorry for interrupting that that you wanted him o go out and buy an LPM in order to sell his laser

Hey f22wz....

the Document is dated January 22 2008...
a lot of things can change/happen to a Laser in almost 2 years....

Anyway.... this is moot... the Laser has been sold...
Thanks for pointing out that someone is blind...:gj:


[Edit]
@rhildinger.... sorry for that... but I'm not fighting...
I just asked a few questions about your Laser when I was
called out by the "Forum Police"..

Jerry

 

[john_lawson]

wait he meant 2009 and thats what it says the chrome looking ones arent that old
i got the very first one i thought last year

yess i just checked I got Jacks very first polished new style unit 8-2-2008 rpl 375

 

[bryce007]

wait he meant 2009 and thats what it says the chrome looking ones arent that old
i got the very first one i thought last year

yess i just checked I got Jacks very first polished new style unit 8-2-2008 rpl 375

I was thinking the same thing, but I didn't know for sure.

 

[lasersbee]

Hey John is that August the 2nd 2008 or Februrary 8th 2008...

I just went by the 1st post (he stated Jan 22 2008) and the date
on the Document... It could be a 9 or an 8... hard to tell...:thinking:

Jerry

 

[rhildinger]

Sorry, I was going off the document as well when I posted the laser for sale, but when I look back over my email records, the actual purchase date was January of 2009, not 2008 as I originally wrote. When I look at my full size certificate photograph, it's clear that Jack wrote January 22nd, 2009.

-Robert