Ok --n/p you must admit that you would never want to have a collection like he one in the photo from Bill at his Lasorb site- & btw thay make several versions of Lasorbs and I can only think that one would not do the same protection for all diodes.
Not meaning any debate but Bill has only posted in three threads- one started Markusunread, one by me and the other by 'mark' who thanked Bill for his post-- so where is he posting in an offensive manner??
He only gets personal when pushed and he cannot help about the opinions of others. Lasershow folks have no reason to love handhelds and many reasons to dislike thier existance. Anyone who gets involved in DIY PJs or doing shows sooner or later find valid reasons to not find them to be such a good thing.
Lasers to them are tools not toys.
Bill will never be 'just' another lpf member- and if he came on as such , some would be critizing him for pretending to not be involved in the industry.
In his only second post ever at LPF he writes...
quote:
In any event, for hobbyists on this forum, it might not be all that important. If you folks don't see the value, then you don't see the value, and that's that. But for people who want to protect laser diodes that are significantly more expensive, or who absolutely can not tolerate a failure, LASORB is an absolute bargain!
Best regards,
William Benner
unquote
Man!!! he is really shoving this down our collective throats (sarcasm)
I have met Bill at SELEM, heard his presentation and you will never meet a more friendly, sincere and helpful guy. Pangolin is his 'baby' and they are the leaders in lasershow SW. And since there is practically no market for Lasorbs at LPF IMO his only motive in posting was to be helpful by sharing the vast amount of info and testing Pangolin has in regards to ESD-- by defination 'Spamming' as a critizisim is invalid as LPF is not a market for Lasorbs.
and this photo from the Lasorb site is proof that they know how to kill a lot of diodes lol..(so others may not do the same)
If you want see the paragraph titled.. 'Why we are confident in our results"
its the third one down here:
http://www.lasorb.com/02_we-destroyed-hundreds.htm
So you can see that the cost of Lasorbs reflects many expensive pieces of equipment and years of testing and at considerable cost to develope Lasorbs. Its too easy to say that a few dollars worth of veristors etc makes the Lasorb some kind of over-priced bad deal.
again just hak's dos centavos.