IgorT
0
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2007
- Messages
- 4,177
- Points
- 0
Re: Key Chain Blu-ray... With FlexDrive!
When i said that a red and a blu would be the same load, i meant a red and a blu of the same power..
Look: (bottom of page 3)
In the battery life calculations i said the 117mA PHR was a heavier load than a 180mA red. Ee went through so many different diodes at different currents, that i got confused as well..
Anyway, you have a 200mW red now. If you test the battery life with it, then you can simply assume, that the battery life with a high efficiency 6x will be similar. How similar depends on the 6x's nd red's Vfs (because that determines their actual efficiency). 405nm's have higher losses in optics, but you found a freak 6x. If it's actually a high efficiency diode then the battery life should be similar.
Besides, you can test this simply by measuring the Flexy's current draw on a full 10280 when powering that 6x, and comparing it to the 200mW red. If you get the same or similar starting current draw, the battery life will be similar.
But there are cases, when 405nm diodes just seem to have a higher efficiency (differential efficiency - mW per mA) while in reality they have a higher Vf, and the actual efficiency (mWoptical per mWelectrical) is not really higher.
I've noticed this, when testing 4x diodes. A few of them had seemingly MUCH higher than normal efficiency. But then i looked at the Vf data, and they also had a much higher Vf! But i never went as far as to actually make mWopt. per mWel. comparison graphs.. But it would be interesting to do so
If this should be the case with your freak 6x, then the higher differential efficiency won't make it consume less electrical power..
When i said that a red and a blu would be the same load, i meant a red and a blu of the same power..
Look: (bottom of page 3)
IgorT said:But if you use the 660nm AR coated acrylics, i see no reason not to get the same battery life with a 200mW red as with a 200mW blu..
In the battery life calculations i said the 117mA PHR was a heavier load than a 180mA red. Ee went through so many different diodes at different currents, that i got confused as well..
Anyway, you have a 200mW red now. If you test the battery life with it, then you can simply assume, that the battery life with a high efficiency 6x will be similar. How similar depends on the 6x's nd red's Vfs (because that determines their actual efficiency). 405nm's have higher losses in optics, but you found a freak 6x. If it's actually a high efficiency diode then the battery life should be similar.
Besides, you can test this simply by measuring the Flexy's current draw on a full 10280 when powering that 6x, and comparing it to the 200mW red. If you get the same or similar starting current draw, the battery life will be similar.
But there are cases, when 405nm diodes just seem to have a higher efficiency (differential efficiency - mW per mA) while in reality they have a higher Vf, and the actual efficiency (mWoptical per mWelectrical) is not really higher.
I've noticed this, when testing 4x diodes. A few of them had seemingly MUCH higher than normal efficiency. But then i looked at the Vf data, and they also had a much higher Vf! But i never went as far as to actually make mWopt. per mWel. comparison graphs.. But it would be interesting to do so
If this should be the case with your freak 6x, then the higher differential efficiency won't make it consume less electrical power..