Some blunt advice. I don't think someone with 2 wavelengths should be the judge on what wavelength is what color.
Someone had to say it...
Everyone's eyes are different. Whether someone might. see 635 as orange-red, or orange, or bright red, or cherry red, or strawbery red, or whatever-the-heck-red, really doesn't matter. On top of that, what I see as blue, might be what you see as red. The sky (blue) may be what you see as red, and cherry pie (red) might be a bright blue. It's all subjective, these are things that are impossible to test, as you cannot tell someone, or describe, what the color is without using objects to refer to.
It's like explaining sight to a blind man. It's impossible.
I can understand wanting to know kinda-sorta where it all fits in, but there is no benefit in arguing over what wavelength you call red, or the type of green/yellow 556/561 is.
It's all arbitrary.
Use your own judgement. If 589-594 is golden yellow, and 532 is green, what do you think the middle would be based on elementary explanations of the spectrum?
Think about it.
P.S. I feel like there's another wavelength-to-color thread every 2 weeks. Why?