IsaacT
0
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2010
- Messages
- 5,947
- Points
- 83
So here is what I ended up with. Full disclosure, I was not getting as much detail as I really wished I could get(I suspect it is similar to why things photographed in soft light aren't as sharp, soft light, soft image). So I kind of adapted a frequency separation workflow to my processing. I used 500 pictures of the Blood Moon to create a stacked, improved blood moon image. I then used about 300 pictures of the full moon I got from directly after the eclipse ended to create a stacked image of the full moon, which you can see below. Since they were the same focal length image, processing them resulted in the same sized moon photos, just vastly different in appearance. So I used the full moon stacked image as my texture layer, and I used my Blood Moon stacked image as my color layer. I applied a Gaussian blur to the color layer to get rid of details and then blended the two layers together.
At the very bottom you can see what my original sub of the blood moon looked like. Let me know what yall think! I know it isn't 100% true factual capture, but a lot of what we do in astro is making stuff work for us; working with layers, stacking, etc.
Also...I had to drive a LONG ways to get away from the clouds....originally I thought it might end in disaster(not getting the picture). That said, I got about 4500 good quality pictures.
Thanks,
Isaac
At the very bottom you can see what my original sub of the blood moon looked like. Let me know what yall think! I know it isn't 100% true factual capture, but a lot of what we do in astro is making stuff work for us; working with layers, stacking, etc.
Also...I had to drive a LONG ways to get away from the clouds....originally I thought it might end in disaster(not getting the picture). That said, I got about 4500 good quality pictures.
Thanks,
Isaac
Last edited: