- Joined
- Dec 10, 2013
- Messages
- 1,343
- Points
- 83
So I was shining my 405 on a wall (as you do) and I noticed the dot seemed a little dimmer than I remember it being. I briefly wondered if the laser was actually a 404nm frequency doubled DPSS and hadn't "warmed up" yet, but then quickly realised that was unlikely. I took my glasses off and the dot became brighter. Sure enough, glasses back on and it dimmed. It was then I remembered my glasses had the anti glare component and probably had UV protection to some degree, hence the dimmer dot.
I then walked over to the wall and out of pure curiosity I put the glasses very briefly in front of the dot. It dimmed, as I expected, but I also got a bit of a fright and thought I'd ruined my glasses:
As well as having an anti-glare component, they also have the coating which reacts to UV and hence darkens them with the sun. The laser had temporarily cooked the glasses but thankfully they have since cleared up.
This then got me thinking had a human eye been subject to the same brief exposure, the damage to the retina could have been severe. This was an unfocussed, comparatively (in the grand scheme of things) weak laser beam.
Your eyes don't generally get second chances - wear goggles.
I then walked over to the wall and out of pure curiosity I put the glasses very briefly in front of the dot. It dimmed, as I expected, but I also got a bit of a fright and thought I'd ruined my glasses:
As well as having an anti-glare component, they also have the coating which reacts to UV and hence darkens them with the sun. The laser had temporarily cooked the glasses but thankfully they have since cleared up.
This then got me thinking had a human eye been subject to the same brief exposure, the damage to the retina could have been severe. This was an unfocussed, comparatively (in the grand scheme of things) weak laser beam.
Your eyes don't generally get second chances - wear goggles.
Last edited: