Derr, the same questions ASKED BY OTHERS... you really dont read, just post I guess..
Detrimental is the POSSIBILITY here, with no data to confirm HIS CLAIMS that it DID NOT DAMAGE... english??
The engineers im sure did not intend for the array to be run outside the projector after defeating the ENGINEERS implemented switch on the access panel to the array, and be run outside and AWAY from the >3< high power COOLING fans..
Again, are you serious?
:horse:
Oh, yes, I am serious.
Unlike what your pathetically tiny brain thinks, my English is fine. You started this whole shitstorm, and I don't see why you shouldn't answer the questions personally. Why should I have to read through your senseless trolling if I want to find answers to something
you started? If you think you can start this and creep away from it like a yellow-bellied coward, sorry, but it doesn't work that way.
I have records of the -rep, saved for your posterity.
Also, I left your past out of the discussion, purely out of respect for you, which you quite clearly have proven incapable of showing anyone else here. I thought you would know better, and I did not bring up what had happened in the past. Don't think I didn't do a quick search- your past stays with you. Despite that, I chose to ignore that, and what
Prototype and
pontiacg5 had said about you, and make up my own mind. I should have listened to what they told me, it'd have made no difference with some lying coward who hides behind the Rep system.
Turns out it's no surprise you were banned from the forum. Not only is having multiple accounts here against the TOS, deliberately inflating prices to catch less-informed buyers is frowned upon here. Although you may call it 'business', business does have it's limits, and where people like yourself have overstepped the thin blue line, it is not taken lightly at all.
It's no surprise either that you reacted adversity to Tech_Junkie. Why? Because what he had said was true. Everyone here's been trolled by T_J, and it's often an amusing experience at that, and it's one of the things that make Tech_Junkie himself.
Except what he had said was true, and quite obviously, you didn't take the truth too well did you? And when you were losing the very 'sh!t' that you'd started, you decided to quietly disappear by blaming it on Prototype and pontiacg5? Is the best you can do- come along, threadjack a perfectly good thread, start an argument, then blame it on two other people who had
absolutely nothing to do with starting the argument? It was
your fault,
you started it, and it is
you who should be sorry, not anybody else.
You didn't want them to find out about your past, did you? Now that it's gotten out, the first thing you can do is try to make pontiacg5 look bad so you can draw attention away from yourself. You're only digging yourself deeper and deeper into a cesspit. Better stop now and apologize to
Prototype and
pontiacg5 while you still have the chance.
As for the diodes, have you got any data to say that it did indeed do damage? Your claim goes both ways. Everyone who've received one of these diodes have reported no abnormalities, power loss, or sudden diode death (as was the case with one of scopeguy20's diodes, which was tested as you described).
So, should I let loose at scopeguy20 (doing what you are doing to pontiacg5) and accuse him of selling crap diodes that LED after a few seconds?
Give up. The community hates you. Even Tech_Junkie hates you, and that's saying something. Go back to scamming people on eBay in the name of 'business' if it makes you feel any better about your pathetic self.
