SenKat_Stonetek said:
Poor form, Jack
I am sorry your health is poor, for the record - but you just stomped in all over Pseudo's thread, with no regard for respect. You really should start your own thread dealing with the sales of your product - I was simply pointing out to the previous author, his mistake in stating that Optotronics makes the RPL's. Before any feelings are hurt - I smack down ANYONE who goes thread jumping, so please do not think for a second it is all about you, because it is not. I do hope you feel better soon.
Hi Greg,
No feelings are hurt and thank for the good wishes, I also hope your back is doing better.
I know you didn't say that quote, but was only replying to another post.
No, I'm not stomping on someone else's thread, our model name is in the title and that alone is more than enough relevance to post me comments, replies or rebuttals...If none of us could do that, then it would quickly turn into a "non-free" type forum like another we know. I do agree with you about stomping on threads with totally unrelated information like happens quite often, but that's part of the price to pay for a free and open forum the exchange of comments. opinions and ideas.
As for poor form, I thought this was a thread about a DX killer and taking out DX? I think it's relevant, but I will also make a separate thread by next week and DX, Carter or anyone is free to post in it as well, it's about our DX killer and it's a free and open market.
Not to add flame to the fire as I've been holding this back for some time, but since "poor form" is being talked about. Is it not poor form for someone to jump in with" shameless "PM me" posts whenever someone mentions an interest in an RPL? Or how about contacting people after they had placed an order with Optotronics and telling them it's not too late to buy one of theirs instead and suggesting to them (and I quote) " to Cancel the order with Optotronics if I didn't receive it yet, and that he is sure we can work it out".
Now that is really poor form with a little sign of desperation thrown in on the side; this is not the same Pseudo that I knew and considered the "Ralph Nader" of the laser world.
I thought that that Pseudo might be coming back when he recently said he was getting out of the laser sales business to begin his laser review company/website; perhaps that was just me reading between the lines and assuming he was getting out of the business so that there would be no conflicts of interest.
Now a couple comment s about the RPL that Pseudo got from us.
It was purchased from Optotronics in early August of 2006 (production was begun on the 1st RPLs in June of 2006 and his was part of the original 1st shipment from the 1st production run. Much has changed since then.
As far as testing, each RPL's average output power is determined by a (3 ) 1-minute trends on the field master meter, without the beamed being turned off at any point between runs thus by the time the 3rd pass is completed, the laser has been on and in continuous use for close to 5 minute (a 30 second or so warmup time before trending is started and then about 20 seconds each between the 2nd and 3rd pass so the the trend can be reset and data recorded. I do it this way as a limitation of the meter, if I go to a 3 minute trend, the sample period is also reduced by a factor of 3 thus instead of samplng at 10 times per second, it's get reduced to 3 times per second and any fast dropout that could easily be seen with the eye could be missed due to any 1/4 second glitches that happen in between samples. Beyond that, if there is ever problem, it will be handled in the warranty period (but that would be short for a DX special or our "bare bones" systems, but they are promised to meet their spec during their warranty period or they will be repaired or replaced.
One advantage that Pseudo offers with his products is a free laser power plot, very cool, DX doesn't give those out and in fact DX doesn't even test their lasers at all. Optotronics offers the full laser cert. but it's not free as my meter is older and doesn't interface with my notebook and even on a PC with a serial port, the results are not ploted as far as I know, just the raw data, So when I do it, it takes time, nearly 45 minutes or so as I have to take photos, convert them from RAW format, resize the for the word document and enter other measurements manually (kinda primative, but they look pretty good).
I've been shopping around for a good beam profiler so that very accurate automatic measurements of divergence as well as 3D color power plots, these are pretty expensive (4 to 6k), but the funds have been set aside and were looking. When we get the new toy, I'll want to use it all the time and since they are all interfacing nicely via a USB or firewire port, we'll also offer free of cost of these detailed results to RPL buyers as it will only take minutes to perform. (well, now I'm getting off topic, so I'll end it there).
Keep an eye on Optotronics in the next few weeks, the RPL laser body is taking on a whole new look that will be exclusive to the Optotronics RPL, so they will be very easily distinguished from any others on the market.
More news later. I wanted to keep this a secret as well, but I'm over flowing with excitement (hey, not that kind of excitement!) as this has been many months in the works...Stay tuned.
jack