- Joined
- Sep 12, 2007
- Messages
- 9,399
- Points
- 113
I've always wanted a beefy portable, and I'm afraid I might have lost my X-105.
Count me in for the discount and the 350 w/ 2.5W diode.
Count me in for the discount and the 350 w/ 2.5W diode.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
potatorage said:How much would the deposit be?
SenKat_Stonetek said:[quote author=VillageIdiot link=1213928982/0#7 date=1213952148][quote author=john_lawson link=1213928982/0#6 date=1213951272] :-X
bootleg2go said:If our customers are looking for a low price alternative to DX and don't need the 12 month warranty or any of the other advantages like the upgrade program or free shipping to/from china for in/out of warranty repairs, then Optotronics will be there for them with a competing product, but much faster delivery than from DX.
Jack
bootleg2go said:( I'm not just talking about the diode as there's more to our regluar RPL than just the diode (don't ask it's proprietary and every company has it's secrets to give their product an edge on the competition)
pseudonomen137 said:So Jack will give you the same offer I will, except he will charge for warranty shipping costs if you have any problems, and he's still using his 20 second test method while I still use a 60 second test cycle (IE, an RPL 400mW may be the same as a Prometheus 350mW due to the differing test methods, but never vice versa).
*scratches head*... Well if any of you feel that is somehow a better deal, feel free to jump on it!
Yeah, this tends to happen whenever I make a thread about my Prometheus or Oceanus units. I've just come to have to accept it. Sorry guys! Hopefully we can still stay as on topic as possible.Razako said:I can see this thread turning nasty in 5 4 3 2 1....
bootleg2go said:[quote author=SenKat_Stonetek link=1213928982/12#13 date=1213969818][quote author=VillageIdiot link=1213928982/0#7 date=1213952148][quote author=john_lawson link=1213928982/0#6 date=1213951272] :-X
SenKat_Stonetek said:Poor form, Jack
I am sorry your health is poor, for the record - but you just stomped in all over Pseudo's thread, with no regard for respect. You really should start your own thread dealing with the sales of your product - I was simply pointing out to the previous author, his mistake in stating that Optotronics makes the RPL's. Before any feelings are hurt - I smack down ANYONE who goes thread jumping, so please do not think for a second it is all about you, because it is not. I do hope you feel better soon.
pseudonomen137 said:Sorry Jack, I know what you mean. I used to try to never be too harsh or take any sides on anything. I still try to operate with as little bias and as much truth as possible, but I'm taking a more 'in your face' slant to things, eh? Kinda happened with the whole explosion of scammers out there who did it with no subtlety, and yet were still defended by large portions of the community. That pissed me off enough to start speaking my mind about pretty much any hyped up company I saw something bad with.
And yeah, I do sell things myself from time to time (the Prometheus Oceanus thing isn't something I always have, and I rarely sell any - haven't even sold 10 units to date). My profits on things are usually pretty slim and I encounter enough random losses to make up for it. Still, I find it kinda fun, and a great way to learn about a lot of different lasers and equipment without draining my pockets too heavily. I don't mean you, or anyone any serious competition, but I like to be left in peace while I do what I do. If people give even the slightest hint of criticism I feel is undue, I respond accordingly. (correct and constructive criticism is welcomed, but we rarely distribute that around the forums)
Sorry about the 20 second test comment. I checked your site and it still said you were just doing 200 sample, 10 sample/sec tests. You may want to update that so everyone can understand how thorough your test method is.
And in the end, this sale I'm doing is mostly to remind people that DX ain't god. I fully agree about how horrible their total lack of testing is, and their horrible RMA/cust support policy makes it very hard to recoupe losses when you get screwed by them. Admittedly, I am doing this out of personal frustration with DX. No harm is meant to you, though yeah, I see how it doesn't exactly help your business. I promise I don't mean to do anything on large volume though, and I shouldn't cost you more than a few customers every now and again. I hope you don't mind too much as I'm really not doing this to cause any damage to opto (which though I have plenty of disagreements with, is still one of the best there is).
Anyway, that's about all I have to say about that - not interested in getting caught up in the forum etiquette discussion quite yet (its important stuff, but perhaps better argued in a separate thread). You've teased me about that beam profiler before, so I'm not sure how much to trust you're gunna get one soon, but I'm really interested in seeing the results if you do! I've yet to see any part of our hobby see any good beam profiler tests to let us know TRUE divergence and modal characteristics. Too bad we don't have DIY beam profilers, eh?
And thanks for the kind comments RattleHead. I can't say I haven't botched my fair share of deals, but I try my best to fix things up in a way thats fair to both me and my customer.
Off topic, but so everyone knows, when I test lasers its about the cold harsh numbers. My reviews will be done completely independent of anything I think or sell. I can't say I don't have biases, but I assure you I will never let the slightest hint of it creep into my test methods. I'm not afraid to admit if the data shows I'm wrong, I just try my best to make my biases right from the start
pseudonomen137 said:Off topic, but so everyone knows, when I test lasers its about the cold harsh numbers. My reviews will be done completely independent of anything I think or sell. I can't say I don't have biases, but I assure you I will never let the slightest hint of it creep into my test methods. I'm not afraid to admit if the data shows I'm wrong, I just try my best to make my biases right from the start