- Joined
- Apr 2, 2009
- Messages
- 98
- Points
- 0
As you say the exterior is dictated by necessity. I'm glad we can agree. The inside tightens? I think I understand - you are referring to the through hole where the wires run from the LD in the AixiZ module to the flexdriver/driver. Well, frankly its an easy design choice to make. The wires are thin and only need a hole a couple of mm across (but its not worth doing that to save a little metal for other reasons so I chose a diameter which clears the LD pins so no shorts are possible plus viewing to verify this is possible) and the more metal in the sink the better. Immediately when building these sinks it makes no sense to the builder to make the pocket for the driver any larger than necessary. Same goes for the AixiZ pocket. I've been doing this sort of thing for a while (though not specifically laser sinks) so its really very easy for me.IgorT said:So we both came up with the exact same Max-Mass FlexDrive heatsink idea at the exact same time? Is that it?
All i know is that i sent you a drawing of my heatsink/module plans, and then see it here. The part where it gets tight in the middle, leaving room only for two wires is the part that got my attention.
Outside and the PCB step, that's a different thing. That is something dictated by necessity, if the module is to be closed off by the PCB and fit the host.... But you have to admit it looks exactly the same on the inside as well.
How come you didn't mention anything then, when you saw my design?
The dimensions of the cylinder must be the same to fit the host. The dimensions and depth of the aixiz module hole must be the same (and Flex driver pocket) if they are to fit a retain metal. The diameter and depth of the rim for the battery connect PCB must be identical as these are all factory parts. I suppose it looks odd on the surface but in reality I'm not surprised two people making an optimised sink for the same host with the same parts came to a very similar design. Its practically inevitable. Anyways, I'm sure there will be some inner dimensional difference. I did that sink purely but fit and feel on the lathe and wasn't working from any schematics sheet - no need when you have a good set of vernier calipers and all the components on hand ready to go.
When you sent me your design to make a sample I had already made a thread less sink on exactly this design principle for ishtob - and the day I made your samples I was swinging by my machines enroute to catch a plane. I simply banged them out and posted them (did they arrive by the way?) I noted obviously that they were for the Romisen based on the cylinder length and diameter and obviously for a AixiZ module and as stupid as it sounds I didn't think past that, I didn't twig that the lip was the same diameter as the host terminal connects PCB (I don't retain figures/birthdays etc very well, keep having to look at the damn schematic). You see I was flying to see my girlfriend and I had other things on my mind. : If I had forseen this unfortunate misunderstanding coming I would have naturally said, /hey that looks like something I made recently' - though I suppose even then you would only have my word on it except for the date of my heatsink thread. Ishtob ordered it on the 13th October and I was able to make in quickly as I had already experimented with this design. As a heads up I plan to release a solid sink where there is no AixiZ module, just one massive sink with a 5.6mm laser diode pocket and a threaded cylindrical volume in the front (9x0.5mm) standard thread for the AixiZ lenses.