Q & A
1)
What is the minimum beam diameter , not clear to me what do you mean,minimum beam diameter, means focused as only then you can have minimum beam diameter and in that case you should not test any laser when focused to minimum beam diameter, max beam diameter is 15mm, radius 7.5mm.
lasers have to be not focused recommended, same is with laserbee. up to 200mw can be even focused i tested it and it does not affect its operation although unfocused is the best practice... little bit off focus will do.... max power I tested is 2000mw I had no laser over that power..
2) like I said 2000mw
3) i did not use it, like I said I am not manufacturing this I made one 1 year ago with lots of errors and trials and a few for myself.. only one I sold and guy was over the moon, can read his feedback and tests hes done on items page... have a look another video out of those 2 and another one was testing a 2w laser 445nm... I noted it's hobby like but it will do what you would expect a hobby like lpm to do.. mAX OUTPUT IT CAN measure unfocused with beam no bigger then lets say 12mm x 12mm save to go instead to the edge of 15x15mm and sensor should be fine to stand up to 7000mv on fresh set of batteries..
hope that was as honest as it can be and answers all your questions..
maybe after you could be next one to give me a good review too
if you are up for a challenge send me your lowest range or cheapest lpm meter and I will do a test video comparing it to mine
and rest of the people can send their lasers to be tested including return postage labels, or i will get myself some lasers to be tested just so we can do a comparison...
I will return your meter back to you and it could be fun to find out if it's worth or not.. what do you say sir ?
I am not a novice when it comes to opams and circuits..
regardless of circuitry and components used ,gain etc. just wrong level of coating over the sensor could change whole circuit design..
it could simply make it look like there is not enough gain or the other way around .. so you know sir with hand on your heart even if post my circuit out ,the final version, it would be very hard for anyone to get everything just right. sensor really makes the difference a lot..
and you yourself know this too... I spent a lot of my free time testing, probing and working on errors .. and for someone who is not a electronic guy it will be pretty difficult if they just simply lay-down components and expect circuitry to work just like that.. perfection takes time and I know this subject now a lot better Jerry ... hope this was as good as you expected it to be...
may I ask Jerry kindly : do you send every unit to NIst .. hand on your heart Sir, I doubt it truly and honestly.. you may use a unit as some sort of reference for your calibration but if you send every unit yourself to nist price would have to be huge.. even big and huge companies don't do that.. they calibrate it by them-self by using known source references..
[/URL]